Search for: "Doe v. South Carolina" Results 161 - 180 of 1,883
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2011, 12:21 pm by Tim Hatton
Turner, South Carolina Supreme Court Opinion No. 26793). [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:08 am by SC Divorce and Disabilty
We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORYHusband and Wife were married on December 15, 1973, and last resided together on November 22, 2003, in Lexington County, South Carolina. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 2:51 am
However, she made clear that the claim is irrelevant to the case under South Carolina law. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 2:17 pm by Bob Farb
An officer who does not follow a state’s extradition procedures may be subject to civil liability for violating an arrestee’s extradition rights; see Wirth v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 8:00 am by Brian A. Comer
ComerThis case brief involves an action brought by South Carolina Attorney General Henry McMaster against a pharmaceutical company, captioned State v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 3:18 am
The United States District Court for the District of South Carolina recently had occasion to apply the test in Power Beverages v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
The trial court in the Court of Appeals in South Carolina held that it does and thus barred the indemnity action brought by Providence Hospital. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 1:24 pm by Russell Mace
The Fourth Circuit previously held in Roseboro that a conviction under South Carolina's failure to stop for a blue light satisfied the test established by the United States Supreme Court in Begay v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:44 am by Gregory Forman
This blog is inspired by myriad important family law issues that current South Carolina case law and statute don’t adequately answer. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 4:00 pm
 It does seem like SunTrust did in fact properly serve the South Carolina lawsuit, since surely the woman knew she was being evicted from her home. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 1:26 pm by Gregory Forman
 South Carolina does not appear to criminalize mere sodomy that isn’t also buggery. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 9:25 am
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the South Carolina Wildlife Federation, et al (Defendants) jointly appeal the district court's order vacating the 2001 base flood elevation determinations adopted by FEMA for Richland County, South Carolina. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 2:22 pm by Russell Mace
The Supreme Court of South Carolina previously ruled under State v. [read post]