Search for: "Doe v. State"
Results 241 - 260
of 104,692
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
Other states Mis-classification of gig workers has been a major issue in numerous states. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:34 pm
In Planned Parenthood Arizona, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 10:32 am
Pix credit here The question of the photograph has been at the center of modernity, and now deeply embedded in the reconsideration of the intersubjectivity of the person (and social collectives) in their encounters with the simulacra of the virtual and its generative consciousness (Jan Broekman, Knowledge in Change (Springer, 2023); Larry Catá Backer, 'The Soulful Machine' Int'l J. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:24 am
It has been argued that stealing from a corpse does not count. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 8:59 am
What it does. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:16 am
Nearly a decade ago, in Yates v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Other states have similar, recent decisions [see Western Millwork v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 5:10 am
United States. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 5:01 am
From Friday's decision by Judge Denise Cote (S.D.N.Y.) in Farrakhan v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 4:05 am
State of Michigan, (Sup. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
The Executive Order does not purport to restrict all transactions within its ambit, nor does it establish a mandatory data localization regime. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
For example, in the 2014 case of Hobby Lobby v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 7:28 pm
So what does this mean for the future of Red Lobster? [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 3:32 pm
These guidelines largely follow the Federal Circuit’s holding in Thaler v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 1:25 pm
The lawsuit (State of Texas v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 1:07 pm
The difference between the two definitions was addressed in the recent case of State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:35 am
”[11] In 1813, the American vessel, Marquis de Somerueles, was carrying cargo from the Italian Academy of Arts when it was captured by the British.[12] The United States successfully petitioned the Admiralty Court of Halifax to have the cargo be returned to the United States.[13] The Court held that the arts and sciences are entitled to protection as “an exception to the severe rights of warfare. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:05 am
McDaniel v. [read post]
