Search for: "Doe v. State Bar of California" Results 1 - 20 of 3,794
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2020, 1:53 pm
  But the State Bar says he's not an employee of the state; he's an employee of the superior court. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 10:52 am
Conclusion: nobody in their right mind would take the California bar exam unless they were really, positively, absolutely sure that they were going to practice law in the state for the next fifty years.For one, the CA bar is ridiculously expensive. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 11:29 am
Does it matter which side of the debate he's on; e.g., whether he's trying to argue that the bar exam discriminates against minorities or -- as here -- that affirmative action is a bad idea? [read post]
15 May 2018, 3:48 pm by H. Scott Leviant
(2) Does California Labor Code § 226 apply to wage statements provided by an out-of-state employer to an employee who resides in California, receives pay in California, and pays California income tax on her wages, but who does not work principally in California or any other state? [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 9:37 am by Jacob Sapochnick
The state bar argued that Garcia had met all of California's requirements for a law license. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:38 am by David Frakt
According to last month’s released results, California examinees scored 17 points higher on the Multistate Bar Examination than the national mean (1428 v. 1411 scaled points). [read post]
24 May 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Hall, which held that the Constitution does not bar suits brought by an individual against a State in the courts of another State. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 9:54 am by Camille Fischer
The court ruled that requiring the State Bar of California to de-identify personal information that could be linked to specific bar applicants creates a “new record” because it requires the State Bar to “recode its original data into new values. [read post]