Search for: "Doe v. State of Florida Judiciary Systems"
Results 61 - 80
of 183
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2012, 10:39 am
The upcoming decision in Florida v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 3:07 pm
White. 536 U.S. 765 (2002) (discussing, and to some extent limiting, state restrictions on extra-judicial speech); Williams-Yulee v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:57 am
" The case interpreting 440.20(12)(c)(2) was Lopez v. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 9:57 pm
State of Florida, SC06-1241, April 16, 2007. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
" (NSBA v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 4:45 pm
When judicial officers seek to speak out publicly by participating in demonstrations, vigils, protests, or marches, two countervailing interests are at play: the First Amendment rights of the judge versus the state's interest in preserving the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:30 am
But none had a higher profile than her decision in Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm
Motivated reasoning is not new to the judiciary—all men are mortal—but it is brazen in the travel ban cases. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 5:34 am
Cir. 2006) (Florida law); Bozeman v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 8:18 am
Florida and New York might lose one seat, as might Georgia, Illinois, New Jersey, and/or Nevada, among others. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 5:31 am
(4) Where does state sovereign immunity come from? [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am
As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 6:07 am
A report released Tuesday by the New Jersey State Commission of Investigation found these problems in the state prison system regarding gangs. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 8:29 am
” Shelby County, Alabama v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm
He said said that the attack on the judiciary was “undermining the rule of law” and that politicians “could have been quicker and clearer” in their defence. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 7:09 pm
We believe that it does.")), or to apply them (Scott v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:33 pm
Constitution or in Supreme Court precedent for the judiciary to set aside state laws that commit to the voters the determination of whether racial preferences may be considered in governmental decisions, in particular with respect to school admissions. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Pam Karlan also hones in that piece from long ago, as does Joey Fishkin. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 4:59 pm
Lawyers, successive parties, and confidentiality” As usual, updates on the Coronavirus guidance can be found on the Courts and Tribunal Judiciary. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 1:55 am
As such, I imagine that this proposition does not present the same ground for challenge that California Prop 8 does. [read post]
