Search for: "Doe v. The City of Detroit" Results 1 - 20 of 237
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2013, 6:53 am by Joy Waltemath
The ruling came in response to a challenge against the City of Detroit’s bankruptcy filing last Thursday. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 7:50 pm by Adam Levitin
 What it does do is stop the progress of litigation against the city and key personnel. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 10:06 am by John Stephen
In Jane Doe v City of Detroit, the court upheld summary judgment for Detroit on a transgender employee’s complaint of harassment. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 7:20 am by Kristina Araya
In Parise v Detroit Entertainment, L.L.C., Case No. 295183, the Court of Appeals concluded that MCL 600.2939(1) does not enable a plaintiff to recover money he lost while legally gambling at a casino established pursuant to the Michigan Gaming and Control and Revenue Act (MGCRA). [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 11:31 pm
City of Detroit Dowtown Development Authority, (ED MI, Aug. 8, 2007), involved a challenge to a Facade Improvement Plan (FIP) designed to enhance the appearance of a portion of the city of Detroit in anticipation of the 2005 Major League Baseball All-Star Game and the 2006 NFL SuperBowl. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 8:48 am
City of Detroit, No. 283922, holding that the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) did not have governmental immunity  from the plaintiff’s suit in tort for injuries he suffered when concrete from the fascia of an overpass fell onto his windshield. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
However, the city of Troy does not have a single approved Muslim Mosque or other Muslim religious institution within the city.32. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 12:52 pm by Andrew Hamm
Liability for cities after employee violations of the federal protections for persons with disabilities In Jones v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 11:45 am by Jeanne Long
In McCracken v City of Detroit, No 294218, the Court of Appeals held that affirmative defenses are not pleadings requiring a response and that the absence of a response stands as a denial of the defense even if the opposing party makes a demand for a response. [read post]