Search for: "Doe v. Tompkins" Results 61 - 80 of 171
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2016, 9:12 am by Venkat Balasubramani
YouNow’s declaration does not explain this discrepancy; nor does it explain what the “license agreement” is. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 1:35 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Barnes & Noble 23andMe’s Browsewrap Fails, But Its Post-Purchase Clickthrough Works Anyway–Tompkins v. 23andMe Facebook’s “Browsewrap” Enforced Against Kids–EKD v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 6:55 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Qwest 23andMe’s Browsewrap Fails, But Its Post-Purchase Clickthrough Works Anyway–Tompkins v. 23andMe Jawbone Plaintiff Can Invoke California Choice of Law Provision in Service Agreement [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 8:48 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Barnes & Noble 23andMe’s Browsewrap Fails, But Its Post-Purchase Clickthrough Works Anyway–Tompkins v. 23andMe Facebook’s “Browsewrap” Enforced Against Kids–EKD v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 8:19 am
  Just look at the FDA’s “reference 5” − Defendant’s [FDA’s] Memorandum of Points & Authorities In Support of Motion to Dismiss or Summary Judgment, Allergan Inc., v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:03 am by Venkat Balasubramani
However, Plaintiff does not and cannot contend that the Terms of Service do not apply to her use of Gmail. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 11:12 am
Tompkins is best known for its statement that “[t]here is no federal general common law. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 10:24 am by Venkat Balasubramani
(“23andMe’s Browsewrap Fails, But Its Post-Purchase Clickthrough Works Anyway–Tompkins v. 23andMe“.) [read post]
27 May 2015, 3:41 pm
Because the AmeriKat does not believeshe is doing anything wrong, does this give her a defenceto destroying a toilet paper roll? [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:30 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Barnes & Noble * 23andMe’s Browsewrap Fails, But Its Post-Purchase Clickthrough Works Anyway–Tompkins v. 23andMe * Court Blesses Instagra [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:47 am
Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit 1977) (Title III does not apply between spouses). [read post]