Search for: "Doe v. a CORP" Results 21 - 40 of 16,259
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2024, 7:51 pm by Maria Hook
The New Zealand High Court has now decided that, in its view, there is no place for anti-suit injunctions under the TTPA regime: A-Ward Ltd v Raw Metal Corp Pty Ltd [2024] NZHC 736 at [4]. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
And it is incumbent on each of us to make sure it does not come to pass and that investors are not harmed by noncompliance with the securities laws when it comes to this new technology. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm by Howard Knopf
This was preceded by the Court’s 2015 decision in Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 10:40 am by Wolfson & Leon
Weekly D1495, 2023 WL 4919540, at *2 (Fla. 3d DCA Aug. 2, 2023), quoting Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 7:19 am by Ronald Mann
ShareAs securities cases go, Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 7:25 am by Unknown
However, private parties remain free to bring claims based on Regulation S-K Item 303 violations that create misleading half-truths, and the SEC retains authority to prosecute violations of its own rules and regulations, including Item 303 (Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 4:15 am by David Lynn
On Friday, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The law is very clear that an agreement to perform unaudited services does not shield an accountant from liability because an accountant must perform all services in accordance with the standard of a reasonable accountant under similar circumstances, which includes reporting fraud that is or should be apparent (see 1136 Tenants’ Corp. v Rothenberg & Co., 36 AD2d 804 [1st Dept 1971], affd 30 NY2d 585 [1972]; see also William Iselin & Co., Inc.… [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 8:15 pm by Lyle Roberts
Supreme Court has issued a decision in Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. [read post]