Search for: "Does 1 - 21" Results 81 - 100 of 18,412
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2011, 7:03 am
Warrantless arrest in the home on a 21 day old controlled buy violated the Indiana Constitution, and the Fourth Amendment is not even considered. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 10:50 pm
(reloaded).Law 21 still does not clarify which exemption applies to homes with building permits dated between September 1, 2006 and June 30, 2009. [read post]
2 May 2013, 5:00 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
  While the Commentary amendments provide that issuers who use an independent ability-to-pay standard only for applicants under the age of 21 are not engaging in age-based discrimination in violation of ECOA/Regulation B, the final rule does not entirely eliminate an issuer’s ECOA/Reg B risk. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 12:01 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
§ 2254(d)(2) merely because the state court does not conduct an evidentiary hearing. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 10:48 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
Does it make any sense to be budgeting by polling numbers? [read post]
21 May 2008, 1:06 pm
A sub-plot involved the feds also going after the governor, which plan ended when the gov leased some land (in White Plains) to the feds for $1 a year. [read post]
11 May 2023, 2:21 am by Aida Tohala (Bristows)
Claim 1 of the patent as granted was to the compound per se. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 5:37 pm
October 21, 2008): Plaintiff next argues that the Voter ID Law violates his right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 5:31 am by Blog Editorial
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Tower MCashback LLP 1 and another, heard 21 -22 February 2011. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 1:31 am by Tessa Shepperson
I would like to evict a tenant who has a rent arrear of 1 & 1/2 month’s rent and a Section 21 notice has been served. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:56 am by Alex Phipps
Reviewing (1), the Court of Appeals explained that a missing page from a trial transcript does not automatically justify a new trial. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:21 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Note "Non-Media" Jury Prejudice and Rule 21(a): Lessons from Enron, 30 Rev. [read post]