Search for: "Does 1 - 34" Results 41 - 60 of 5,667
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2009, 6:02 am
Nottage 34 FLW 993, 3rd DCA, Deadlocked jury-based on the totality of circumstances. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 4:29 am by admin
C-34 (Competition Act) does not apply to upstream agreements (that is, agreements between competitors in relation to the purchase of a product or service). [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 7:35 pm
  What does SSI consider "signaficantly improved" in regards to mental illness? [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 1:01 am by CMS
Second is that the Lord Advocate’s interpretation of Sch 6 para 1(f) by-passes/undermines this. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 2:35 am
No. 87544; Whistleblower Award Proceeding File No. 2020-1 / November 15, 2019) https://www.sec.gov/rules/other/2019/34-87544.pdf Although the body of the SEC Order only references "Claimants" and does not indicate the exact number of this multiple-party state, Footnote 1, in part, states that:[U]nless Claimants, within ten (10) calendar days of the issuance of this Order, make a joint request, in writing, for a different allocation of the award... [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:21 pm
Here is a basic summary of relevant Georgia law on this subject: Georgia's jury duty leave law comes in under the Official Code of Georgia Annotated at Title 15, Ch. 1; Title 20, Ch. 2, Art. 17, Part 5; Title 34, Ch. 1. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 8:19 am
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration reports that car accidents are the leading cause of death for Americans between the ages of 1 and 34. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 8:52 am by Jon Gelman
"The Court reasoned that both the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as well as the statutory restrictions of confidentiality N.J.S.A. 34:15-128(a)(1) and N.J.S.A. 34:15-128(3) required that a strict Protective Order be entered.Seymoure v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 10:44 am by PaulKostro
The reasons for concluding that the apparent inconsistency between the sections of the UCCJEA codified as N.J.S.A. 2A:34-54 and N.J.S.A. 2A:34-65(a)(1) should be resolved in a manner that gives full effect to both factual predicates for home state jurisdiction under N.J.S.A. 2A:34-65(a)(1): Considerable confusion has arisen in this matter regarding how to analyze the children’s “home state” for purposes of determining jurisdiction. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 3:40 am by Matrix Law
If not, it cannot be the subject of a reference under paragraph 34 of Schedule 6, which would mean that the Court does not have jurisdiction to decide it. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:04 pm by V.D.RAO
The jurisdiction of Civil Court to decide all such questions is barred by Section 34 of the said Act.33. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 3:17 am
§ 32-1-107, if any document is notarized, the facts contained in the notary's certificate are presumed correct. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 7:19 am by Louise Thorning Ahle
Sign Goods/services Remarks VA 2014 00460   Classes 21 and 34. [read post]