Search for: "Does 1 - 84"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,404
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2010, 2:28 pm
The Court noted that the Fourth Amendment does not permit the stopping of potential witnesses. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:00 pm
§ 924(c)(1)]. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 1:17 am
The Board does not agree with this finding.2.2 The Board considers at least the following features of claim 1 to be o [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
The amended description according to auxiliary request 1 differed from the description according to the main request only in that said sentence was deleted.[2] In order to meet the requirement of A 84 that the claims have to be supported by the description, the adaptation of the description to amended claims must be performed carefully in order to avoid inconsistencies between the claims and the description which could render the scope of the claims unclear. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 2:41 am
(Section 524(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code.) [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 9:00 pm
Decision G 1/03 therefore does not apply.4.5 The first auxiliary request is thus not allowable, because the subject-matter of claim 1 extends beyond the content of the application as filed, contrary to Article 123(2) EPC.(...)7.2 The board thus concludes that the claims of the third auxiliary request are novel.8. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 9:37 pm
The court found that the town does not act in excess of its authority when it creates a zoning district for senior citizens, or when it limits the occupancy of dwelling units within a planned retirement community to persons aged 55 or over. [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 11:01 am
Claim 1 of the auxiliary request read:1. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Federal Defined Contribution Health Plans—A rule finalized in 2019 (84 Fed. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 8:47 am
Unfortunately, that logic does not work. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
In this respect it does not matter whether the issue was raised under A 83 or A 84.[1.4] As far as the amendments are concerned, the Board remains of the opinion that claim 1 as maintained does not comply with A 84, for defining a result to be achieved “… the electrodes are spaced apart from each other so that, in normal use of the razor, the electrodes will not be bridged …”. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:45 am
Therefore, the task that the plaintiff was engaged in at the time of the accident was the task of riding in a pickup truck, which, as indicated, does not present an elevation-related risk.The Second Department also found that, even if Labor Law § 240(1) applied, plaintiff would not be entitled to recovery because, under the circumstances of this case, any failure on the part of the general contractor to provide the plaintiff with protection from riding in the back of the… [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:45 am
Therefore, the task that the plaintiff was engaged in at the time of the accident was the task of riding in a pickup truck, which, as indicated, does not present an elevation-related risk.The Second Department also found that, even if Labor Law § 240(1) applied, plaintiff would not be entitled to recovery because, under the circumstances of this case, any failure on the part of the general contractor to provide the plaintiff with protection from riding in the back of the… [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 12:16 pm
There are two issues with respect to OTS’s used tire program and the Rules:Issue 1: It is unclear why the Rules developed by OTS require stewards to pay fees on new tires when Ontario Regulation 84/03 clearly states that the program is for used tires. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 6:47 am
Furthermore, the auxiliary requests 1 and 3 were found not in conformity with Articles 123(2) and 84 EPC and the auxiliary requests 4 and 5 filed at the oral proceedings were not admitted.III. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 4:39 am
Souza, 223 F.3d at 1201; see also Smythe, 84 F.3d at 1242-43; Pleasant v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 7:16 am
On that basis, it does not matter which party discharges the re-sale right, as long as one of them does. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:44 am
Such an Article 9 decision does not conclude that there is an infringement of EU antitrust rules and does not impose a sanction. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 8:52 pm
Dec. 84, 1993 WL 127621 (1993) [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:55 am
– September 29, 2009 – The G.B. has the same issues with this as does the U.S. [read post]
