Search for: "Does 1-2, inclusive"
Results 41 - 60
of 4,316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2015, 3:10 am
As MJIL will be publishing a special issue for issue 17(2), authors are encouraged to submit early so as to incorporate any revisions prior to print deadlines for 17(1).Form of SubmissionsMJIL accepts submissions in the form of articles, commentaries, case notes and book reviews. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 11:00 am
Blog posts & press:"Correspondence: Ageing out of Place in COVID-19 Pandemic Era: How does the Situation Look Like for Older Refugees in Camps? [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 7:28 pm
Code §643(f) does not apply to trusts that were irrevocable on March 1, 1984 except to the extent additions to corpus were made after March 1, 1984. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 9:41 am
And, therefore, I am ordering 1.3 times the $38,000 number, for total fees and costs, inclusive of everything, of $50,162.78. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 9:41 am
And, therefore, I am ordering 1.3 times the $38,000 number, for total fees and costs, inclusive of everything, of $50,162.78." [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 4:02 pm
The inclusion of a fax number or e-mail address on any document does not constitute consent to service by fax or e-mail unless otherwise provided by law [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 2:01 pm
E365 1. [read post]
17 May 2017, 3:03 am
The relevant test consists of the first two parts of the Section 2(a) deceptiveness test, and does not include a materiality requirement. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 2:19 pm
They are permissible in the narrow context of (1) selling a business, (2) partnerships, and (3) LLCs. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 1:23 am
BFDI (Der Bundesbeauftragte für den Datenschutz und die Informationsfreiheit) Bundesdatenschutzgesetz (original German) In no. 1, I was struck by: a) The use of Article instead of section for § b) The difficulty of navigating to sections 5, 43 and 44 c) Section 43 (2) 'fails to appoint a commissioner for data protection' - I would only use this for the Federal Commissioner - here, prefer 'data protection officer' (No. 2 has 'data… [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:24 pm
All it does is tell CPSC to get rolling on a regulation with in one YEAR of the passage of this law. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 1:28 pm
So where does that leave Resolution 2018-B012? [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 9:58 am
The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate, or otherwise, of Defendants DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, are unknown to Plaintiff who therefore sues said DOE Defendants by fictitious names. [read post]
17 May 2023, 6:30 am
This is a laudable goal, but it does not come without legal risks. [read post]
17 May 2023, 6:30 am
This is a laudable goal, but it does not come without legal risks. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 11:42 am
Appoint a "transparency officer" who does not have structural conflicts of interest in promoting transparency at the agency USTR should immediately appoint a transparency officer who does not have any structural conflicts of interest in promoting transparency at the agency. 4. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 6:24 am
These costs to developers include (1) added complications and uncertainty for clinical trials process (such as those suggested by the FDA), (2) a potentially lower likelihood of being authorized or approved due to those complications, and (3) the substantial PR (and potential liability) risk if clinical trials result in harm to pregnant people. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:06 am
To dissect this, we delve into three pivotal facets: 1. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 7:08 am
Doe 1 v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:12 pm
Note that inclusion of an application on the MX list does not mean that that application has yet been deemed grantable, or even acceptable, by the staff. [read post]
