Search for: "Does 1-2, inclusive" Results 61 - 80 of 4,315
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2009, 8:05 am
When deciding which party to award these costs to, the Court must consider the factors listed in CPR 47.18(2) including CPR 47.18(2)(b) which is the amount by which the bill has been reduced. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 9:44 am by Tim Zinnecker
From an email message which I received earlier today: Boston College Law School invites applications for a full-time legal writing faculty position to teach Law Practice 1 and Law Practice 2. [read post]
17 May 2022, 4:13 pm by Eugene Volokh
" [S]ubsection (b) [of the Act] mandates, in detail, the form that that notice must take: Signage of the notice must be posted in a manner that is easily visible to a person entering the public restroom and must meet the following requirements: Be at least eight inches (8") wide and six inches (6") tall; The top one-third (1/3) of the sign must have a background color of red and state "NOTICE" in yellow text, centered in that portion of the sign; The bottom… [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 3:12 pm by Armand Grinstajn
The Board in decision T 473/98 decided that this is not the case and that moreover the inclusion of obiter dicta is appropriate for an OD as it may obviate the need for remittal in the event its decision (in this case revocation of the patent) is reversed on appeal (see point 2 of the reasons). [7] A 76(1), 123(2) and 123(3) all are concerned with the issue of "added matter". [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:22 am by Toni Guarino
  For further information contact Barroway Topaz Kessler Meltzer & Check, LLP (Ramzi Abadou, Esq. or Erik Peterson, Esq.) toll free at 1-888-299-7706 or 1-415-400-3005, or via e-mail at info@btkmc.com. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:54 am
Co. v Blakely Pumping, Inc. (2nd Cir., 2/1/2010) When may a negative or limiting policy definition be considered an exclusion subject to the timely disclaimer and denial requirement of New York Insurance Law § 3420(d)(2)? [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 11:01 am by oliver randl
Thus, claim 1 does not require the teeth to be adjacent. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 4:20 am by Broc Romanek
This cessation can occur for one of two reasons: (1) the company files a subsequent clean audit opinion (subsequent improvement) or (2) the company fails to file audit opinions altogether (subsequent disappearance). [read post]
12 May 2009, 3:59 am
An all-too-frequent misfortune is the over-inclusive or the under-inclusive settlement. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 12:00 pm by Unknown
 Bronze OA:"Non-Refoulement during a Pandemic – with a Contextual Analysis of Border Closures Imposed by the EU, the US and India," ILI Law Review (Summer 2022)- Author = IndiaDiamond OA:"Community-Based Research in Fragile Contexts: Reflections from Rohingya Refugee Camps in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh," Journal on Migration and Human Security, vol. 11, no. 1 (2023)- Authors (4) = Bangladesh"Concurrent Displacements: Return, Waiting for Asylum, and… [read post]
24 May 2013, 4:00 am
The arbitrator concluded [1] that the Unions' disputes were arbitrable and [2] that the plan had "as its primary, if not sole, objective," avoiding undesirable teachers by excessing them under CBA provisions relating to closed or phased out schools, which violated CBA requirements that excessing be done on the basis of seniority.* Supreme Court, New York County denied the DOE’s CPLR Article 75 petition seeking an order vacating the arbitration award… [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:45 am by Guest Bloggers
There, the student (1) receives a scholarship of $6,000 and (2) performs services as a researcher, where such services are valued at $2,000. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 9:39 am by Eugene Volokh
Several appellate courts, including the Ninth Circuit (which includes California), have concluded that scholarship and teaching in colleges and universities is indeed constitutionally protected, if it (1) consists of speech on matters of public concern, and (2) passes a balancing test set forth by Pickering v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 3:17 am
The Board dismissed this Section 2(a) opposition to registration of the mark MARATHON MONDAY for various clothing items, ruling that applicant's mark is not a close approximation of Opposer BAA's previously used name or identity, BOSTON MARATHON, and does not uniquely and unmistakably point to Opposer. [read post]