Search for: "Does 1-2" Results 121 - 140 of 107,841
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2016, 12:51 pm by Jamie Markham
So, this latest decision does not directly apply to the revised law (something the opinion itself notes in footnote 1). [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 12:51 pm by Jamie Markham
So, this latest decision does not directly apply to the revised law (something the opinion itself notes in footnote 1). [read post]
1 Apr 2004, 9:02 am by Ed Sim
Filing does not mean anything, the companies may never go public 2. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 8:48 pm
Where you consider the minimum requirements are not met, check part 2 to see whether you must report this to us and for details of any additional requirements.NEW Part 2 QN: 5.14.1 Does the lender require me to report to them where the lease does not meet the CML minimum requirements for leases of roof space for solar PV panels? [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm by Pace Law School Library
The broadcast of New Lighting Technologies will take place Thursday, February 2, from 1:30 to 3:00 p.m. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 10:51 am by Shari Shapiro
  The GSA's recommendation is an interesting one for two reasons: (1) the GSA requires its buildings to be LEED Gold, and (2) the recommendation was not supplemented to recommend LEED v4, even though the GSA did evaluate LEED v4. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 5:14 pm by Theodore F. Smith, Jr.
First National Bank of Monterey that because of the 2005 amendment to I.C. 30-5-9-2(b), the common law presumption of undue influence does not apply to a transaction even when an attorney in fact benefits if the following conditions exist: 1. [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 1:48 pm by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-201, a Massachusetts case, the judge -- in response to an ex parte motion for expedited discovery -- sua sponte ordered the plaintiff's counsel to show cause why the case should not be severed as to Does 2-201. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 9:07 am by Monica Scherer
In Maryland, the “family home” is statutorily defined as real property in the State that was (1) used as the principal residence of the parties when they lived together, (2) is owned or leased by one or both of the parties at the time of the divorce proceeding, and (3) is being used or will be used as a principal residence by one or both of the parties and a child. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 9:57 am by Marcel Pemsel
Art. 41(1) CDR does not mention patents but only designs and utility models. [read post]
This deduction economically offsets the prior income inclusion under subsection 15(2), but does not eliminate or override the original inclusion for tax purposes. [read post]