Search for: "Does 1-205" Results 21 - 40 of 1,000
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2017, 1:30 am
The reference to the "successor in title" in Article 87(1) EPC is generally interpreted as requiring a transfer of the right of priority before the filing of the subsequent application (T 205/14, Reason 3.4). [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:46 am
The following questions have been referred: 1 (a) Does the ground for refusal or invalidity in Article 3(1)(e)(i) of ... [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:47 pm by John Floyd
              The post What Religious and Racial Hatred Does to American Criminal Justice appeared first on . [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 6:35 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
On the decedent’s side are the values of (1) the decedent’s “net” probate estate (Section 2-204) and (2) the decedent’s nonprobate transfers to others (Section 2-205). [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 12:49 pm by WIMS
Federal Election Commission (Case No. 08-205) [See WIMS 1/22/10]. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 3:23 am
Samara Bros., 529 US 205, 209-210, 54 USPQ2d 1065, 1066 (2000). [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 10:44 am by Pillsbury Investment Fund Group
Grandfathering:  Subject to the transition rules of Rule 205-3, the June 2016 SEC order generally does not apply retroactively to clients that entered into advisory contracts (including investors that invested in a private fund) prior to the August 15, 2016 effective date. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:29 pm by Andrew Ledbetter
Does this impact 3(c)(1) funds that are “exempt reporting advisors”? [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 4:30 am by Kevin Couch
The code allows two different types of glass: 1) a tempered glass that shatters into dull pieces (safer for restrained occupants) and 2) a laminated glass that does not shatter (safer for unrestrained occupants by decreasing risk of ejection.Important to the Court's analysis was the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's withdrawal of a proposed rulemaking. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 10:00 pm
However, the Court of Civil Appeals stated that this conclusion does not automatically mean that the Alabama Workers’ Compensation Act applies. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 3:21 pm by James Hamilton
The MFA urged the SEC to clarify in the final rule that a 3(c)(1) fund will be deemed to have satisfied Rule 205-3 if an equity owner of the fund that itself is a 3(c)(1) fund is in compliance with Rule 205-3. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 3:50 am by Abbe Gluck
The big three are 1) the text: 2; the location: and 3) Congress’s consistent way of expressing inseverability throughout the U.S. [read post]