Search for: "Does 1-30 defendants"
Results 21 - 40
of 7,864
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2011, 7:51 pm
Defendants did not meet the 30-day deadline. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 1:43 pm
This story is headed "Commissioners, county council members respond to public defender's 30-day suspension. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:05 pm
Peavy, 89 S.W.3d 30, 39 (Tex. 2002); Otis Eng’g Corp. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 3:54 pm
Dec. 30, 2014), plaintiff originally brought suit against two defendants related to a surgical sponge being left in her body. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:52 am
Borders, Inc., 257 F.R.D. 1, 3 (D.D.C. 2009). [read post]
20 May 2022, 10:26 am
The clock for defendants seeking removal does not technically begin to tick until service of a summons. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:04 am
” Instead, on December 30, 2010, he fired Rope. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 6:01 am
§ 28-1-106). [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 5:06 am
In addition, the council learned late Friday that the Legislature cut $1 million from its request for midyear funds to pay for indigent defense programs through June 30. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 7:05 pm
The NJ appeals court stated that this 30-day law, “ensures that a defendant receives timely notice for the allegations charged…” “It protects the accused from the hazards of defending against stale allegations. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 6:00 am
Michaels Stores, Inc., Case No. 1:13-CV-831, 2013 U.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 3:19 pm
The Court made it clear that its decision does not mean that defendant did not do anything wrong. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:52 am
The preamble of Claim 1 does not describe a tangible medium, either, such that it could 'give life' to the claim. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 1:00 pm
The clock for defendants seeking removal does not technically begin to tick until service of a summons. [read post]
9 May 2009, 12:21 pm
Utah May 1, 2009): [T]he Tenth Circuit would prefer courts "'not use the term 'standing' as shorthand for a defendant's capacity to challenge a search,'" the court does so here for clarity. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 9:30 am
In light of this, the defense modified its request for relief, seeking to proceed in a manner that does not impair the physical health of the defendant in lieu of a full abatement of the proceedings. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 6:11 am
First, the plaintiff claims that, because a TNA arbitration panel is not a 'committee of' the department, it does not constitute a '"[p]ublic agency"' pursuant to General Statutes (Supp. 2014) § 1-200 (1) (A). [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 8:11 am
(See Doc. 30 at 32:16–33:7 (describing receipt for two of Defendants' products for total cost of $100)). [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 7:49 am
See MacCaull, 2012 W.L. 6777380*1 fn.1 citing with “See, e.g. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 5:47 am
P. 65(b)(1)(B). [read post]
