Search for: "Does 1-4 v. United States Attorney Office"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,959
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
Based on this conclusion, Blackman and Tillman “contend that the phrase ‘officer of the United States’ has the same meaning in Section 3 as it does in the Constitution of 1788. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:00 am
The Case of the Day is United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 8:38 am
Special Counsel Smith does not hold an "office," and he is not an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
Ex. 4. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 12:40 am
Doe v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:25 pm
1. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:37 pm
Ratification was advised by the Senate of the United States of America on December 1, 1975. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 1:18 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 1:18 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:17 am
United States v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 9:00 am
Article 4(1) states generally that extradition shall not be granted for political offenses. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 2:41 am
Apte v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 12:35 pm
Defense Attorney: Jerome Kaplan 4. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Article 4(1) states generally that extradition shall not be granted for political offenses. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
Article V(1) states that extradition shall not be granted for political offenses. [read post]
9 May 2011, 9:00 am
Article 4 states the mandatory grounds for refusal of extradition. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 12:26 pm
” The implication should be obvious, while a Governor (or the president of the United States) has the inherent authority to remove or reassign people they appoint to office, a Governor (or the president of the United States) does not have the authority to remove, or assume the responsibilities of, a constitutionally elected officer except as provided for in the constitution. [read post]
