Search for: "Does 1-41" Results 1 - 20 of 4,560
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2024, 10:09 am by Russell Knight
” (Emphases added.) 750 ILCS 5/501(c-1)(3)(emphasis provided) Interim attorney’s fees should be liberally granted. [read post]
10 May 2024, 7:23 am by bklemm@foley.com
Notably, while the Final Rule sets an $8 amount for late fees, it does not set the amount for the wider category of penalty fees, for which Larger Card Issuers may still use adjusted threshold amounts. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:04 pm by Béligh Elbalti
In addition, Article 1(1) of Federal Legislative Decree No. 41/2022 states that “The provisions of the present Legislative Decree shall apply to non-Muslim citizens of the UAE and to foreign non-Muslims residing in the UAE, unless they invoke the application of their own law in matters of marriage, divorce, succession, wills and establishment of filiation. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
The amicus brief focuses on the importance of the case for artists and freedom of expression, framing the February ruling as a threat to the First Amendment.[38] Specifically, the coalition seeks the court’s clarification that an artist’s intent to sell or otherwise commercialize their art does not impact the balancing test between trademark owners’ rights and artists’ rights.[39] In an interesting comparison, the brief notes that Hermès itself took the name… [read post]
5 May 2024, 6:44 pm
While Hong Kong’s ratification to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) occurred in 1976 during the colonial era as the United Kingdom’s ratification was extended to the then dependent territory, Annex I, Section XIV of the 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration and Article 39 of Hong Kong’s Basic Law legally guarantee that the ICCPR remains in force in Hong Kong since the end of the colonial era on 1 July 1997. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Specifically, the Seventh Circuit held that although a district court does not have the inherent power to review a mootness fee paid to an individual shareholder following the voluntary dismissal of a suit under Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it nonetheless may review the fee following intervention in the case by an absent shareholder, a Rule 60(b) motion for relief from judgment and an evaluation of compliance by the plaintiff and his attorneys with Rule 11 of… [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 3:12 pm by Bill Marler
 E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 12:25 am by David Pocklington
The petitioners’ attention is also drawn to the CBC Guidance Note on fonts. [41]. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 7:35 pm by Bill Marler
It is simple genetically and evolves quickly, and exposure does not lead to lasting immunity. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
ENDNOTES [1] The famous case involving this phenomenon is Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am by admin
Wells’ meta-analysis does not pass muster under Rule 702 because its methodology was unclear, inconsistently applied, not replicable, and at times transparently reverse-engineered.[18] The court’s evaluation of Wells was unflinchingly critical. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
O’Connor-Ratcliff, 41 F. 4th 1158, 1170–1171 (9th Cir. 2022); accord, Knight First Amdt. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:01 am by Deanne Sowter
Case Commented On: KMN v SZM, 2024 BCCA 70 (CanLII), overturning 2023 BCSC 940 (CanLII) We have both written previously on myths and stereotypes about intimate partner violence (IPV), one of the most common of which is that women make false or exaggerated claims of violence to gain an advantage in family law disputes (see here and here). [read post]