Search for: "Does 1-45" Results 121 - 140 of 7,214
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2024, 6:09 pm by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
ICEL4 is approved for:19.00 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™All healthcare professions can claim AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)! [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 5:00 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Porta Sophia identifies ~90% (26) of these active applications as highly threatening “Tier 1” status, meaning the claims would do significant damage to the psychedelic field if granted by locking historically utilized therapies behind high paywalls and limiting future research. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
Respectfully, we also write to raise serious concerns about the reliability of Professor Lash's writings on Section 3 and to make clear what the historical record does—and does not—say.[1] By answering seven questions, we will show that (1) there was a First Insurrection, (2) John B. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 11:12 am by Katelynn Minott, CPA & CEO
How can you apply for it, and what does life in South Korea look like? [read post]
  The CNIL, however, is more specific on this point in step 1 of its draft guide. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Roberto Gargarella Introduction The Collaborative Constitution is one of the most interesting contributions produced by the legal academia in recent years.[1] It is a clear, easy to read and at the same time profound book, in which its author, Professor Aileen Kavanagh, investigates what is the best and most justified way to protect rights in a democracy. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:22 am by Eliav Lieblich
Then, I argue that the geographical nexus requirement, in fact, is extremely difficult to defend in terms of the lex lata, legal policy, literature or practice.[1] This piece does not, however, discuss in detail the obligations in fact owed to Protected Persons in situations or territories once the geographic nexus requirement is rejected. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:30 am by Stephanie Rossello
For the purpose of this blogpost, the following question is relevant: “Does article 61(1) of Regulation [2018/858] constitute, for vehicle manufacturers, a legal obligation within the meaning of article 6(1)(c) of the GDPR which justifies the disclosure of VINs or information linked to VINs to independent operators as other controllers within the meaning of point 7 of Article 4 of the GDPR? [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 5:57 pm by Bruce Ackerman
Townsend, 295 U.S. 45 (1935), which unanimously endorsed Lederman’s view. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 7:27 am by Marty Lederman
  Therefore the state court decision in this case does not, as far as I can tell, affect whether Trump appears on the November ballot.) [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 12:45 pm by admin
Socrates viewed philosophy as beginning in wonder,[1] but Socrates and his philosophic heirs recognized that philosophy does not get down to business until it starts to clarify the terms of discussion. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 4:32 am
This evidence does not support that Applicant ever provided such services. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Moab Partners LP,[1] a closely followed case that ought to address whether a purported failure to make a disclosure required under Item 303 of U.S. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 1:42 pm by John T. Wolak and William C. Martinez
A controller must respond to a verified consumer rights request within 45 days of receipt, with the potential to have a 45-day extension. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 1:42 pm by John T. Wolak and William C. Martinez
A controller must respond to a verified consumer rights request within 45 days of receipt, with the potential to have a 45-day extension. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 1:42 pm by John T. Wolak and William C. Martinez
A controller must respond to a verified consumer rights request within 45 days of receipt, with the potential to have a 45-day extension. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am by Guest Author
Cargill this term, the Court has been asked to decide the narrow question of whether a bump stock device is a “machinegun” as defined in the National Firearms Act.[1] However, embedded within the case is an issue that raises broad administrative law questions about how the rule of lenity interacts with agencies’ interpretations of statutes with criminal implications. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:31 pm by Béligh Elbalti
  The contents of volumes 1 (1999) to 19 (2017) are freely available. [read post]