Search for: "Does 1-64" Results 121 - 140 of 2,745
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Moreover the claim amended by the introduction of the disclaimer does not comply with the requirement of clarity pursuant to A 84. [12] Consequently, the Board is of the opinion that the amendment of claim 1 violates A 123(2). [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 4:23 pm by Bill Marler
Hospitalization costs associated with one-month recovery from listeriosis were estimated at US$ 10.4 million[1]. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The rule states:“If the Board of Appeal notes that the appeal does not comply with R 99, paragraph 1(a), it shall communicate this to the appellant and shall invite him to remedy the deficiencies noted within a period to be specified. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 4:19 pm
Most victims were male at a 3 to 1 ratio with women. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm by Guest Author
”[1] And today, a small group of some of the world’s most powerful corporations exercise complete control over that public square. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 1:15 am by Jeroen Willekens
The fact that another competitor has supplied appellant 1 with document D4 does not establish that appellant 1 is identical to this competitor. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 1:58 am
 With relentless and ruthless logic, therefore, the BoA concluded: It follows from the above finding that the process of manufacture to which claim 1 of auxiliary request 23 [the Swiss-form claim], in view of its content, is directed goes beyond the scope of protection conferred by the use claims as granted: in the case of claims directed to a process of manufacture, the effect of Article 64(2) EPC is to extend protection to the "product" obtained by such process… [read post]
29 May 2009, 6:00 am
Costco Wholesale Corp., 171 Cal.App.4th 1, 22  (Feb. 11, 2009) (same). [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 1:03 pm
  For easy reference, a catalogue of the 2008 amendments affecting foreclosure actions is set forth in comment 4 in R.4:64-1. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 8:33 pm by Bona Law PC
In particular, the GC held that a ban on sales over a particular online platform does not constitute a hardcore restriction under EU competition law. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 4:33 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Unfortunately, the description does not contain a clear definition of what the upper end is, and in fact the term only occurs a few times in the summary of the invention. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 6:48 am by Michael Geist
While the music industry continues to focus on a so-called “value gap” that does not reflect the state of Canadian law, mounting data also suggests that it does not provide an accurate depiction of the revenues being generated in Canada today from Internet streaming. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 8:10 pm
Being 1/64 Cherokee or being attracted to other human beings with similar genitalia is worth as many points as speaking Mandarin, Swahili and Arabic . . . combined! [read post]