Search for: "Does 1-79" Results 101 - 120 of 2,076
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2013, 2:15 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Although the unavailability of accommodation does not preclude the granting of an application, it does not mean the comparative quality of treatment at other hospitals is irrelevant. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 5:18 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Here, the People do not allege that the sentence of incarceration of 1 to 4 years is illegal. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 9:03 pm by News Desk
The infected people range in age from 1 year to 89 years old. [read post]
Pennsylvania employers will want to keep an eye on the legislation as it makes its way through the House as Governor Wolf’s administration has promised to resubmit the regulations to the IRRC for final approval if Senate Bill 79 does not pass. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 6:03 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Co., 196 S.W.3d 774, 778-79 (Tex. 2006) (orig. proceeding). [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 1:51 pm
In respect of novelty, the GC expressly referred not only to art. 19 but also to art. 10(1) CDR, which reads:“The scope of the protection conferred by a Community design shall include any design which does not produce on the informed user a different overall impression. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 10:13 am by Joel R. Brandes
But this dispute was immaterial because Article 79 endows ne exeat rights even to “[t]he parent who does not exercise parental rights. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 10:29 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Proportionality: “the extent of the quotation does not exceed that justified by the purpose. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 7:32 am by Marco Rossi
The anti fragmentation rule seems to be consistent with article 13 of the Multilateral Convention and reflects the Commentary to Article 5, at paragraph 79. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 10:45 am by Brian Shiffrin
Pursuant to People v DeBour (40 NY2d 210) and People v Hollman (79 NY2d 181), an analysis of the lawfulness of police action for purposes of determining a suppression motion requires  the court to engage in the legal equivalent of the filming of a stop action animation. [read post]