Search for: "Does 1019" Results 1 - 20 of 235
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Following joinder of issue by respondents, Supreme Court found that "it does not appear that the [APA] board had sufficient information" to consider possible alternative methods of EWM remediation instead of ProcellaCOR or to determine whether to hold an adjudicatory hearing, largely due to the APA staff presentation being rushed, inaccurate and one-sided; Supreme Court held — although acknowledging there were no directives stating otherwise — that staff presentations… [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Following joinder of issue by respondents, Supreme Court found that "it does not appear that the [APA] board had sufficient information" to consider possible alternative methods of EWM remediation instead of ProcellaCOR or to determine whether to hold an adjudicatory hearing, largely due to the APA staff presentation being rushed, inaccurate and one-sided; Supreme Court held — although acknowledging there were no directives stating otherwise — that staff presentations… [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1]  Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3]  One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:24 am
R.C.P. 1028(a)(3) and Lackawanna County Local Rule 1019. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 12:37 pm by Guest Author
It’s not entirely clear which of these two positions Carr and Simington take, but there are some indications that they believe HB20 does trigger intermediate scrutiny. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by admin
Regardless of how many cases are cited (and there are many possible “precedents”), the true parameter does not have a 95% probability of lying within the interval given by a given 95% confidence interval.[9] Similarly, as much as judges would like p-values and confidence intervals to eliminate the need to worry about systematic error, their saying so cannot make it so.[10] Even a mighty federal judge cannot make the p-value probability, or its complement, substitute for the… [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
& Community Supervision], 180 AD3d 1301, 1302 [3d Dept 2020]; Matter of Kocsis [New York State Div. of Parole], 41 AD3d 1017, 1019 [3d Dept 2007]). [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
& Community Supervision], 180 AD3d 1301, 1302 [3d Dept 2020]; Matter of Kocsis [New York State Div. of Parole], 41 AD3d 1017, 1019 [3d Dept 2007]). [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 7:38 am by Jay R. McDaniel, Esq.
  [1] 134 N.J. 488, 634 A.D.2d 1019 (1993) [2] 214 N.J. 364, 70 A.3d 512 (N.J. 2013) [3] 214 N.J. 364, 70 A.3d 512 (2013) [4] 143 N.J. 168, 669 A.2d 1382 (1996) [5] 281 N.J. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 6:34 am
A missed reporting deadline that can bar an expert witness from testifying at a trial does not prevent the expert from testifying in any retrial, the Supreme Court of Ohio ruled today. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 4:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  In York v Frank  2022 NY Slip Op 05738  Decided on October 12, 2022  Appellate Division, Second Department takes the more conservative position, which it does not always do. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
  To what extent does it matter that prayer exists at the intersection of race, culture, ethnicity, or the history and traditions of faith communities? [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 11:15 am by Holly Brezee
Towle, 802 F.3d 1012, 1019-21 (9th Cir. 2015). [7] 17 U.S.C. 106(1). [8] Daniel J. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 5:00 am
-The court also found that the Plaintiff's Jane/John Doe averments in the Complaint satisfied the requirements of Pa.R.C.P. 2005 in order to properly designate an unknown defendant by a Doe designation.As such, all of the Defendants Preliminary Objections were overruled.Anyone wishing to review this Opinion may click this LINK. [read post]
2 May 2022, 7:28 am by Mark Ashton
While quoting extensively from the petition, the Superior Court does a fair amount of grammatical editing. [read post]