Search for: "Does Partnerships I-V"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,833
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
When does a deal involve securities regulation? Part 3: Partnerships and Limited Liability Companies
13 Apr 2012, 4:25 pm
See Steinhardt Group v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 5:52 am
A partnership is treated as a PTP if (i) interests in the partnership are traded on an established securities market, or (ii) interests in the partnership are readily tradable on a secondary market or the substantial equivalent thereof. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
Data is not available for 2020 and 2021. [11] Section 218 of the Act. [12] Wilkinson v Kitzinger (No 2) [2007] 1 FLR 295, per Sir Mark Potter P at [50]. [13] See paragraph 21(2)(d) of Schedule 5; paragraph 5(2)(d) of Schedule 6; and paragraph 10(3)(a) of Schedule 7. [14] GW v RW (Financial Provision: Departure from Equality) [2003] 2 FLR 108; IX v IY [2018] EWHC 3053 per Williams J at [68]; MB v EB [2019] EWHC 1649. [15] Levin, I. (2004). [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 3:45 am
Take, for example, Alizio v. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 12:55 am
Because a distribution of property does not generate gain, some partnerships obtained and distributed marketable securities so that the partner would not be taxed. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:54 am
Since the complaint does not set forth a specific or even a reasonably certain termination date, it does not satisfy the “definite term” element of section 62 (1) (b). [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 1:43 am
” RUPA § 202(c)(1)(i) & (v); accord UPA § 7(4)(a) & (d). [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 4:11 am
I v. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 11:52 am
One difference I noted was the question of when does a civil union or domestic partnership start? [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 6:29 am
I wrote about that case last year. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 12:10 am
Furthermore, the words “undefined time” used in Section 32(c) does not necessarily mean an “indefinite period” (Keith v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 9:33 am
’” Rotenberg said as Congress considers cybersecurity proposals, “the decision in EPIC v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 12:07 am
In Kucher v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 3:08 am
The court’s opinion in Poole v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 4:31 am
I’ll start in New York then head over to Jersey. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 4:37 am
In Burwell v. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 3:26 am
A Train Wreck of a Valuation Case If you want a lesson in how not to litigate an appraisal proceeding, look no further than Fredericks Peebles & Morgan LLP v Assam, 300 Neb. 670 [Sup Ct Aug. 3, 2018], in which the Nebraska Supreme Court recently affirmed the appraisal court’s determination, pursuant to the buy-out provisions of a law firm partnership agreement, of the $590,000 fair market value of a withdrawn partner’s 23.25% partnership… [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:46 am
In the leading Indian decision on the point, Linklaters v ITO, this solution has been rejected. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 1:08 pm
In 2001 they registered their relationship under the German law on registered life partnership of February 16th 2001 (BGBl. 2001 I, p. 266). [read post]
