Search for: "Doherty v. Doherty" Results 1 - 20 of 359
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2008, 9:07 am
Doherty v Birmingham City Council House of Lords “Although the definition of a ‘protected site’ in section 5(1) of the Mobile Homes Act 1983, in excluding Gypsies from the protection of that Act, was incompatible with an occupier's right to respect for his home in article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, incompatible primary legislation had to be enforced and an occupier's defence to a local authority's claim for possession… [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 8:35 am
Doherty v Birmingham City Council (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) [2008] UKHL 57; [2008] WLR (D) 291 “The definition of ‘protected site’ in s 5(1) of the Mobile Homes Act 1983, in excluding gipsies from the protection of the Act, was incompatible with an occupier's right under art 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms to respect for his home. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
Doherty v Birmingham CC [2008] 3 WLR 636 left us all wondering about the form and limits of a challenge to summary possession proceedings. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 11:50 am
Doherty (FC) (Appellant) and others v Birmingham City Council (Respondent) [2008] UK HL 57 That’s 79 pages of reading to do… [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 4:33 pm
At the Court of Appeal, the issue was whether the previous court of appeal judgment in Smith v Evans [2007] EWCA Civ 1318 (actually Smith v Buckland, but continually cited here as Evans) could be considered as still standing after the decisions in Doherty v Birmingham City Council [2008] UKHL 57 (our post on Doherty here). [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:55 pm
So,  Doherty (FC) (Appellant) and others v Birmingham City Council (Respondent) [2008] UK HL 57 Well, well, and once more for effect, well. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 6:04 am by INFORRM
On 8 January 2024, the High Court of Northern Ireland handed down judgment in the case of Kelly v O’Doherty [2024] NIMaster 1 [pdf]. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 9:11 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
O’Doherty’s argument is that it misconstrues the language of the pertinent section of the agreement, and ‘a party’s [...] [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 5:11 am
Reason's Brian Doherty, has an excellent article telling the fascinating story of the origins of the lawsuit that eventually resulted in the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v.... [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2023 Argued: March 19, 2024 Decided: May 10, 2024 No. 23-1217 JASON DOHERTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2023 Argued: March 19, 2024 Decided: May 10, 2024 No. 23-1217 JASON DOHERTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 2:44 am by J
Minority in Kay approved but, so it appears, Doherty also approved. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 2:59 pm
Since then, the Court of Appeal has decided on Doran v Liverpool CC [2009] EWCA Civ 146 (our report) and McGlynn v Welwyn Hatfield BC [2009] EWCA Civ 285 (our report), further shaping the landscape. [read post]