Search for: "Doles v. Doles" Results 1 - 20 of 703
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2017, 8:25 pm
In 2012, Plaintiff Chad Brazil filed a consumer class action against Dole, alleging that the labels on a total of 38 varieties of Dole’s packaged fruit misleadingly describe the products as “all natural,” despite Dole’s use of artificial ingredients, including chemical preservatives synthetic citric acid and ascorbic acid. [read post]
No. 96-517), amended in 1984 by the Trademark Clarification Act of 1984 (Title V of Pub. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 9:02 am by Gene Quinn
At issue in the case, essentially, was whether the extraordinarily successful Bayh-Dole legislation (enacted in 1980) automatically vested ownership of patent rights in Universities when the underlying research was federally funded. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 10:31 am by Stefanie Levine
This morning the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Stanford v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 10:31 am by Stefanie Levine
This morning the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Stanford v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 4:10 pm by Ted Frank
The trial lawyers were able to trick the Tellez v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 9:59 am
Dole Food Company announced today that Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Victoria Chaney has dismissed the $2.5 million in punitive damages that a jury awarded against Dole last November.In Tellez v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 1:42 pm by Joseph Allen
Three events boosted our economic turnaround in the 1980's: the passage of Bayh-Dole, which injected the incentives of patent ownership into the federal R&D system; the enactment of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which insured the courts would apply the patent law consistently; and the Supreme Court's ruling in Diamond v Chakraberty that living organisms could be patented. [read post]