Search for: "Doll v. Doll"
Results 121 - 140
of 678
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2018, 8:58 am
The case focuses on the taxation of promotion items, including the fan favorite bobblehead dolls. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 5:49 am
Photograph by Sharon WrightOrly Lobel’smost recent book, You Don’t Own Me, retraces the story behind the infamous legal battle between Barbie and Bratz, the two market-leading dolls, a legal battle also known Mattel v MGA Entertainment [here]. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:27 am
Questions in the Tom Kabinet CJEU reference finalized (at last) | Court of Appeal, following EPO, reverses Carr J in Regeneron v Kymab dispute | Regeneron v Kymab - Part I: Sufficiency | How do you protect patents from judicial and expert hindsight? [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 1:22 am
Questions in the Tom Kabinet CJEU reference finalized (at last) | Court of Appeal, following EPO, reverses Carr J in Regeneron v Kymab dispute | Regeneron v Kymab - Part I: Sufficiency | How do you protect patents from judicial and expert hindsight? [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 1:57 am
Intern Kat Rose commented on the case, focussing especially on the sufficiency aspect in Regeneron v Kymab - Part I: Sufficiency. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 7:33 am
See Taylor v. [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 8:30 am
Panama: Investment disputes, trademarks and licenses, and ICSID tribunals-"Bridgestone v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 9:14 am
Never Too Late 183 [week ending 18 February] Mr Justice Carr's L'Oreal v RN Ventures decision bristles with warnings on Actavis v Lilly claim interpretation, equivalents and prosecution history (Parts I and II) | Can Wenzhou and cigarette lighters tell us something about why there are IP rights? [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
All of the gift bags contained female blow-up dolls except for the gift bag that Player A received, which contained a male blow-up doll. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
All of the gift bags contained female blow-up dolls except for the gift bag that Player A received, which contained a male blow-up doll. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 10:59 am
| Yet another horse – The Polo/Lauren Company L.P. v Royal County of Berkshire Polo Club Ltd. [read post]
No One Owns Anyone: Orly Lobel's New Book and Thoughts on Knowledge as a Transferable Property Right
19 Feb 2018, 10:00 am
We all know Barbie dolls. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 11:57 am
I am late to the party on this, but I still thought I would point you to Jill Lepore's recent review in the New Yorker of (among other books) Orly Lobel's You Don't Own Me: How Mattel v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:56 am
Tao Licensing, LLC v. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 2:29 pm
Dist. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 9:10 am
Supp. 2d 1310 [5] Id. [6] Smith v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 3:00 am
Frank Adams v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 6:19 am
The opinion is styled, Jorge Vallejo v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:40 pm
Each time we hear the caption of that case — Chester v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 6:58 am
The Police Frameup of Clyde Raymond Spencer On May 18, 2017, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals painted a portrait of this corrupt police practice in the case of Spencer v. [read post]
