Search for: "Dolphin v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 121
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2008, 8:30 pm
Rodriguez Was Remanded Back to State Court, West Virginia University v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 2:00 am
Lolita has been exhibited daily since September 1970, in a show entitled, “the Killer Whale and Dolphin Show”. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:29 am
The plaintiff in the case of Nielsen v. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 2:10 pm
DOM beat us to the punch with his post on the excellent SCOTUS opinion in Wooden v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 1:12 am
Under a previous Court of Appeals decision in Cetacean Community v Bush, the court rejected standing for "…all of the world's whales, porpoises, and dolphins" under environmental protection laws as animals were not expressly included within the provisions. [read post]
1 May 2018, 1:12 am
Under a previous Court of Appeals decision in Cetacean Community v Bush, the court rejected standing for "…all of the world's whales, porpoises, and dolphins" under environmental protection laws as animals were not expressly included within the provisions. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:47 am
Lundberg Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 6:17 am
In Straw v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 7:56 pm
In other words, if the other contracting party is selling Miami Dolphins’ season tickets, states that the NFL declared that the season will not be affected by the pandemic. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 5:03 pm
Tuitt—Nonhuman Rights Project v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 8:49 pm
State v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am
The MP for Ashfield offered his “sincerest apologies” to Dr Tom Dolphin for “any distress caused” by his post on X, formerly known as Twitter, which falsely implied Dr Dolphin had billed for a strike day. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 8:56 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Gulf Restoration Network, et al v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 10:11 am
See United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
In 1986, just four years after the passage of Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Supreme Court held that while the Charter doesn’t apply directly to courts or the common law — at least in the context of purely private litigation — it has residual relevance when it comes to the common law’s application and development (RWDSU v Dolphin Delivery). [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 5:18 am
This blawgger invites the FM to read the decision of Dolphin Drilling Limited v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 2:58 am
Canoro Resources v. [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 4:16 pm
One case in particular, Glawischnig-Piesczek v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 2:50 pm
Emily Bowen, Ohio State Univ. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 7:00 am
She previously authored The Legal History of the Presidential Management Fellows Program and Hansberry v. [read post]
