Search for: "Dombrowski v Bulson"
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2012, 8:52 am
ORTIZ DOMBROWSKI v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 3:52 am
Recently, in Dombrowsky v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 10:57 pm
The case is captioned Dombrowski v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 8:37 am
In Dombrowski v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:58 am
Criminal defense legal malpractice cases are so rare that the 4th Department found but a single case to discuss in the decision in Dombrowski v Bulson ;2010 NY Slip Op 09625 ; Decided on December 30, 2010 ;Appellate Division, Fourth Department . [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:37 am
The case of Dombrowski v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:57 am
Complaint Almeida v Marino Care Risk v Martin Dombrowski v Bulson Finch v Tooher, Wocl & Leydon Genesis Ins v Magma Design Lubin v Cincinnati Ins Rosell v Intl Cosmetic Surgery Shum v Intel Corp Wintermute v Kansas Bankers [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 3:55 am
Generally, recovery for legal malpractice is limited to pecuniary damages (see [*2]Dombrowski v Bulson, 19 NY3d 347; Dawson v Schoenberg, 129 AD3d 656, 658; Young v Quatela, 105 AD3d 735, 736; Brownell v LeClaire, 96 AD3d 1336; Wolkstein v Morgenstern, 275 AD2d 635, 637). [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:39 am
” “To recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must establish “that the attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession and that the attorney’s breach of this duty proximately caused plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages” (Dombrowski v Bulson, 19 NY3d 347, 350 [2012] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Rudolf v Shayne,… [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:49 am
Plaintiffs do not challenge the court’s determination that damages recoverable on the claim, which was based on defendants’ alleged legal malpractice in connection with their representation of plaintiff Atesa Pacelli in a matrimonial action, was limited to pecuniary damages (see Dombrowski v Bulson, 19 NY3d 347, 352 [2012]). [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 2:06 am
Plaintiff must also “show that the attorney was the proximate cause of his or her conviction” (Britt v Legal Aid Socy., 95 NY2d 443, 446 [2000]; see Dombrowski v Bulson, 19 NY3d 347, 350-351 [2012]). [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 4:01 am
” “The Pellegrini defendants have met their prima facie burden demonstrating that they did not depart from the requisite standard of care (see Nomura Asset Capital Corp. v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 26 NY3d 40, 49-50 [2015] citing Dombrowski v Bulson, 19 NY3d 347 [2012]). [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:56 am
To recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff is required to show that the defendant attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession, and that the attorney's breach of this duty caused the plaintiff to suffer actual and ascertainable damages (see Dombrowski v Bulson, 19 NY3d 347, 350; Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442; McCoy v… [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:23 am
To recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must establish “that the attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession and that the attorney’s breach of this duty proximately caused plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages” (Dombrowski v Bulson, 19 NY3d 347, 350 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker… [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 3:30 am
Dombrowski v Bulson 2012 NY Slip Op 04203 Decided on May 31, 2012 Court of Appeals is a case in which both the US District Court for the Western District and the Court of Appeals recognize that the criminal defense attorney failed his client. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:36 am
at 50 [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Dombrowski v Bulson, 19 NY3d 347, 350 [2012]; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434 [2007]). [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 3:59 am
at 50 [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Dombrowski v Bulson, 19 NY3d 347, 350; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434). [read post]
23 May 2018, 3:59 am
at 50 [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Dombrowski v Bulson, 19 NY3d 347, 350 [2012]; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434 [2007]). [read post]
24 May 2018, 3:55 am
(Nomura Asset Capital Corp. v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 26 NY3d at 49; Dombrowski v Bulson, 19 NY3d 347, 350 [2012].) [read post]
