Search for: "Don v. Frankel" Results 1 - 20 of 71
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2012, 1:24 pm
" I'd add that you don't necessarily have to be skeptical to come to that conclusion. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 12:46 pm by Larry Ribstein
  As we saw in the litigation leading up to Jones v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm by Tamar Frankel
Then comes a “trust me”:Please don’t disregard this warning. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 4:37 pm
AU Optronics, segments of which have been discussed by Alison Frankel and Jacob Gershman. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 11:23 am by Steve Bainbridge
As Alison Frankel observes, “If [Lee] is right, a whole category of shareholder suits can be erased. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 3:30 pm by Luke Gilman
They don't exercise or get sleep. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:24 pm by Ron Coleman
 (Notwithstanding the support, I don’t think they like me there anyway.) [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
For Reuters’ On the Case blog, Alison Frankel hazards a prediction “that the court’s conservative majority concludes shareholders don’t have a private right of action, over a dissent from liberal justices who argue the court should not have reached the question. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 9:37 am by Walter Olson
Last week it looked as if the Koch v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 8:05 pm by Walter Olson
“Bloggers = Media for First Amendment Libel Law Purposes” [Obsidian Finance Corp. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 3:02 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court entered its opinion in California Public Employees Retirement System v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
One-time guest Kat and long-time Katfriend Miri Frankel returns to make some pertinent observations about a sudden re-brand that has raised many eyebrows* Co-branding and multiple brands; what they don't teach in your trade mark courseWhen Mondelēz, OREO and Acccenture combine, Neil is bound to offer a perceptive comment. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 8:11 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Ultimately the court says labels don’t help with what is a fact-specific inquiry. [read post]