Search for: "Donovan v. Donovan" Results 101 - 120 of 434
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2015, 2:30 pm
LESSER/European Pressphoto Agency) From today’s decision in In re James v. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 1:50 am
Patterson, getting a not guilty verdict in a felony criminal damage to property prosecution; and Stacey Donovan, who won in State v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 9:30 pm by ernst
The Federal Judicial Center has a new documentary history in its series of Famous Federal Trials: U.S. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Donovan, Half-Baked: The Demand by For-Profit Businesses for Religious Exemptions from Selling to Same-Sex Couples, (Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Vol. 49, 2015).Patrick Talbot, Same-Sex Marriage and Religious Liberty Clashes in the U.S., After Obergefell v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:47 pm by Big Tent Democrat
That of course means Donovan, Dempsey and Altidore. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:13 pm
The opinion follows the standard adopted by the Ninth Circuit court in Witt v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 5:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
GEICO was not limited to its facts which involved the same carrier issuing both policies at issue in that case.In footnote 7 in this Petrie decision, the Pennsylvania Superior Court noted that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court is addressing the Craley issue in the case of Donovan v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 3:21 pm by ADeStefano
"Finally, Justice Tom stated that the decisions of the First Department in this regard were contrary not only to the Court of Appeals, but also to the other three Departments of the Appellate Division, which have all found that questions of fact existed as to the adequacy of the safety device where the injured worker fell after receiving an electric shock (see Grogan v Norlite Corp., 282 A.D.2d 781 [3d Dept 2001]; Donovan v CNY Consol. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 7:14 am by ADeStefano
"Finally, Justice Tom stated that the decisions of the First Department in this regard were contrary not only to the Court of Appeals, but also to the other three Departments of the Appellate Division, which have all found that questions of fact existed as to the adequacy of the safety device where the injured worker fell after receiving an electric shock (see Grogan v Norlite Corp., 282 A.D.2d 781 [3d Dept 2001]; Donovan v CNY Consol. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 6:28 am
Supreme Court established the legal standard for these claims in its landmark 2010 decision in Jones v. [read post]