Search for: "Doran v Wells"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2010, 10:53 am
Lupas of the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas issued an Order in the post-Koken case of Doran v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 4:33 pm
Doran v Liverpool City Council [2009] EWCA Civ 146 concerned a possession claim for a plot on a local authority travellers’ site. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 5:52 pm
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeal pulls back the curtain a bit in Doran v. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 8:15 am
The case is FCC v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 1:39 pm
Apparently, his Lordship considered Qazi, Doherty and Doran. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 3:29 pm
After hearing but before judgment, Doran v Liverpool was handed down by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 7:00 am
The initial issue was the Doran/Taylor issue, ie at what point does the gateway (b) claim arise? [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:24 am
She spoke about recent cases in the Court of Protection, including cases concerning termination of pregnancy and persons in a vegetative state.Mr Michael Lynn, Senior Counsel: ‘Recent Developments in Mental Health Law’: Mr Lynn discussed important cases such as A.B. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:24 am
She spoke about recent cases in the Court of Protection, including cases concerning termination of pregnancy and persons in a vegetative state.Mr Michael Lynn, Senior Counsel: ‘Recent Developments in Mental Health Law’: Mr Lynn discussed important cases such as A.B. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
and (5) what "decision" or "decisions" can be challenged through gateway (b) (that is, just the decision to serve the notice to quit [ntq] or all decisions leading to possession - this is the ongoing battle between two lines of CA judgment, respectively Doran v Liverpool CC [2009] EWCA Civ 146and Central Bedfordshire DC v Taylor [2009] EWCA Civ 613, discussed also in our note of Barber v Croydon LBC [2010] EWCA 51). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am
and (5) what "decision" or "decisions" can be challenged through gateway (b) (that is, just the decision to serve the notice to quit [ntq] or all decisions leading to possession - this is the ongoing battle between two lines of CA judgment, respectively Doran v Liverpool CC [2009] EWCA Civ 146and Central Bedfordshire DC v Taylor [2009] EWCA Civ 613, discussed also in our note of Barber v Croydon LBC [2010] EWCA 51). [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 6:25 am
Monday’s argument in the patent infringement suit Microsoft v. i4i Limited Partnership is still in the news as well. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 6:16 am
Submissions Before the CA, Richard Drabble raised a number of arguments aimed both at the statutory process for review as well as the way it was handled in this case. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 6:21 am
Wells posted the D.C. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
Following Central Bedfordshire Council v Taylor [2010] 1 WLR 446 and Barber v Croydon LBC[2010] EWCA Civ 51 (and contra Doran v Liverpool CC [2009] 1 WLR 2365), at issue is a series of decisions, from deciding to serve notice through to enforcement of a warrant. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm
Following Central Bedfordshire Council v Taylor [2010] 1 WLR 446 and Barber v Croydon LBC[2010] EWCA Civ 51 (and contra Doran v Liverpool CC [2009] 1 WLR 2365), at issue is a series of decisions, from deciding to serve notice through to enforcement of a warrant. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 1:07 am
For example, at issue in Doran Jones, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 6:12 pm
In Velez v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm
Doran (1911) 161 C. 511, 514. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
None of them work very well. [read post]
