Search for: "Douglas Laycock"
Results 21 - 40
of 198
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2021, 7:13 am
As the theory’s leading proponent, Professor Douglas Laycock, has observed, “[i]f a law with even a few secular exceptions isn’t neutral and generally applicable, then not many laws are. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 4:20 am
Professor Douglas Laycock has advocated this in a groundbreaking and important article. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
Two group of scholars, one led by me and one by Professor Douglas Laycock, had worked with lawmakers to include step-offs for churches and religious organizations (353), so I had a better sense of the titanic clash being waged between proponents and opponents of same-sex marriage. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
From SSRN:Mehwish Shaukat, American Muslim Women: Who We Are and What We Demand From Feminist Jurisprudence, 31 Hastings Women's L.J. 155 (2020).Jay Wexler, Secular Invocations and the Promise of Religious Pluralism, (Roger Williams University Law Review, Forthcoming).Thomas Charles Berg & Douglas Laycock, Espinoza, Government Funding, and Religious Choice, (Journal of Law and Religion, Forthcoming).Anton Sorkin, 'Them:' Bridging of Divides Between Distant… [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 9:01 pm
Douglas Laycock, of the University of Texas Law School. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 3:44 pm
Thanks to Caroline Mala Corbin, Janet Halley, Rick Hills, Nan Hunter, Douglas Laycock, Micah Schwartzman, and Steven D. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
The Unnecessary Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2020).Douglas Laycock 1. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
Brunson; Immigration Law’s Looming RFRA Problem Can Be Solved by RFRA, Stephanie Acosta Inks; The Broader Implications of Masterpiece Cakeshop, Douglas Laycock; Native American Religious Freedom as a Collective Right, Michael D. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 6:00 am
The Unnecessary Conflict (Oxford University Press, 2020).We have assembled a terrific group of commentators, including Caroline Mala Corbin (Miami), Janet Halley (Harvard), Rick Hills (NYU), Douglas Laycock (Virginia), Nan Hunter (Georgetown), Micah Schwartzman (Virginia), and Steven D. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 3:22 pm
Douglas Laycock is the Robert E. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 8:53 am
The justices also may take account of an amicus brief in support of neither party filed by law professor Douglas Laycock and a group of other prominent scholars of the law of remedies. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 2:58 pm
Another leading scholar in the field who has supported the parents, Douglas Laycock of the law school at the University of Texas in Austin, also is not here but will get a shoutout from Justice Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 10:26 am
In a brief written by church-state scholar Douglas Laycock and joined by Christian and Jewish organizations, BJC urged the court to reject the radical arguments of the government and its allies. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:05 am
Typical in this regard is the amicus brief of Professor Douglas Laycock, which dwells at length (pp. 31-37) on how the Court might uphold the Peace Cross without changing much else in Establishment Clause doctrine. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 8:51 am
Douglas Laycock, University of Virginia School of Law, has published Religious Liberty (William B. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 8:51 am
Douglas Laycock, University of Virginia School of Law, has published Religious Liberty (William B. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 10:52 am
Mark Hall, '81, and Douglas Laycock, '73: named as Reporters on the Restatement of the Law Third Torts afruland Mon, 01/28/2019 - 12:52 Read more about Mark Hall, '81, and Douglas Laycock, '73: named as Reporters on the Restatement of the Law Third Torts American Law Institute Four Restatement Projects Launch [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
[Thanks to Douglas Laycock via Religionlaw for the lead.] [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 8:41 am
” Writing on behalf of Muslim American veterans in opposition to a different cross display, Professor Douglas Laycock put it more starkly (and colorfully): “If government can sponsor a Christian cross and deny that it has done anything religious, then words and symbols have no meaning and the Court has consigned the Establishment Clause to the world of Alice in Wonderland. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 1:30 pm
As religion-law scholar Douglas Laycock put it, writing in another case on behalf of Muslim American veterans: “If government can sponsor a Christian cross and deny that it has done anything religious, then words and symbols have no meaning and the Court has consigned the Establishment Clause to the world of Alice in Wonderland. [read post]
