Search for: "Douglas v. Commissioner" Results 1 - 20 of 125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2013, 4:10 am by Alice Woolley
The importance of some party being able to put, and in fact putting, the case for the Committee, in the interests of “fully informed adjudication” by the reviewing court, is reflected in decisions such as Children’s Lawyer for Ontario v Goodis (2005), 75 OR (3d) 309 (C.A.) at paras 34-45; and Leon’s Furniture Limited v Alberta (Information and Privacy Commissioner), 45 Alta. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:43 am by Lrwprofs
As reported by Abrams and others, in National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 9:37 am by Jeffrey A. Quinn
And that wasn’t the only lesson the Tax Court recently taught taxpayer Zierdt (Douglas Zierdt v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 10:45 am by Marissa Miller
In the New York Times, Robert Pear reports that Democratic Congressional leaders have filed an amicus brief in Douglas v. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 1:36 am by Mark Summerfield
Scott v Icon Plastics Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 428 (27 April 2012) Patent Opposition - Appeal to the Federal Court of Australia - outcome when neither the original opponent nor the Commissioner of Patents appears and no evidence before the court We reported back in November 2011 on the success of Icon Plastics Pty Ltd in opposing the grant of a patent to Laurence Clifford Scott, on the basis that Scott was not entitled to the patent, because he was neither the inventor nor a… [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:09 am by Patrick Hindert
Hall has approved a $72.5 million preliminary settlement of the Spencer v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:41 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Other speakers include Judge Douglas Ginsburg, FTC Commissioner Joshua Wright, Northwestern’s John McGinnis, and the VC’s own Todd Zywicki. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 10:45 am
 Both Justice Marshall and Justice Blackmun (joined by Justice White) wrote dissents to what I believe is Justice Powell’s first opinion, see Commissioner v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division also noted that the supervisor who allegedly indicated a discriminatory motive was not the ultimate decision-maker, and the record shows that BOE immediately offered Petitioner another tenured track position after terminating his employment in the Homebound Program.The court commented that the same result would obtain whether the matter was analyzed pursuant to the traditional framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v Green, 411 US 792, or under a… [read post]