Search for: "Doyle v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 521
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2020, 5:11 am
In Leslie Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate it was stated, by Judge Posner, that it was impossible to “find any basis in statute or case law for extending a copyright beyond its expiration. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:20 pm
This morning, the Court handed down its opinion in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 4:21 am
United States v. [read post]
12 May 2008, 9:16 am
U.S. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 3:42 am
Unfortunately for the complaining LLC member in Doyle v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 5:15 am
Korey Kaul won in State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 8:12 am
The underlying issue is whether "the prosecutor violated his constitutional rights under Doyle v. [read post]
11 Feb 2005, 2:51 am
Joseph Doyle, the executive director of the [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 5:07 am
In Paroline v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 4:05 am
Cortright v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:55 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 4:10 am
In John Doe 122 v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:56 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] ruled [opinion, PDF] 5-4 Wednesday in Paroline v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 8:00 am
Barbara Ann Drebek-Doyle v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 2:56 pm
Doyle v. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 6:32 am
United States v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 11:05 am
The Oregon Court of Appeals reversed the Oregon State Board of Nursing (OSBN) in the case of Shank v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 2:26 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Doyle & Ors v R [2012] EWCA Crim 995 (16 May 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Rehill v Rider Holdings Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 628 (16 May 2012) Sulamerica CIA Nacional De Seguros SA & Ors v Enesa Engenharia SA & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 638 (16 May 2012) Sucafina SA v Rotenberg [2012] EWCA Civ 637 (16 May 2012) JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov [2012] EWCA Civ 639 (16 May 2012) Durden v Aston [2012]… [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 7:34 am
Driscoll v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 2:20 pm
The Conan Doyle Estate also dispatches with what would seem to be contradictory case law, Silverman v. [read post]