Search for: "Drainage District No. 12"
Results 21 - 40
of 92
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2023, 9:16 am
The following information is from the public meeting notice:What: Public MeetingWho: Water Users within the Big Cottonwood Creek areaWhen: January 10, 2024, 4:00 to 5:00 pmWhere: Cottonwood Heights City Hall, 2277 East Bengal Blvd.Purpose: In accordance with Chapter 73-4, Utah Code Annotated, and the Third Judicial District Court (Civil No. 365729835), the State Engineer has completed a general determination of the rights to the use of all water, both surface and underground, within the… [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:13 am
” Per the Court: “Appellant has failed to demonstrate, with citations to the administrative record favorable to the District, that the EIR’s drainage analysis is inadequate. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 7:28 pm
No agency has created a permitting system for drainage districts. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 10:41 am
Major Pleadings and Orders: March 16, 2015: Complaint Attachment 1: 1513756-1--20138.pdf Attachment 2: 1513756-2--23839.pdf Attachment 3: 1513756-3--24074.pdf Attachment 4: 1513756-4--23281.pdf May 22, 2015: Amended Answer September 24, 2015: Memo in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment October 19, 2015: Memo in Resistance to Motion for Summary Judgment January 11, 2016: Order Certifying Questions to Iowa Supreme Court January 20, 2016: Order on Motion to Stay Articles and… [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 2:32 pm
The application specified in detail the means whereby erosion and drainage were to be controlled and wetlands protected. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 7:53 pm
Dodge County Bd of Adjustment, 308 Neb. 63 (12/31/2020) [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 5:13 pm
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 3d, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 4:52 pm
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 3d, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 4:03 am
Prestige Imports, Inc., 2011 WL 4808798 (Fla. 3d DCA October 12, 2011). [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 6:21 pm
The complaint alleged that the Texas Department of Transportation acted negligently by allowing water to accumulate on the roadway because of inadequate drainage. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 9:42 pm
The court found that this, combined with the vote approving the setbacks and drainage plan, constituted substantial evidence that the Board made the required findings. [read post]
2 May 2023, 11:45 am
The Third District upheld the EIR on this point. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 5:18 pm
In an exceptionally thorough and well-reasoned opinion, the Third District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s judgment denying a writ petition challenging respondent 14th District Agricultural Association’s (District) approval of a rodeo event to be held at the Santa Cruz County Fairground pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines’ Class 23 categorical exemption. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
The Corps argued and the district court ruled that the JD was not “final agency action” subject to review. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
The Corps argued and the district court ruled that the JD was not “final agency action” subject to review. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 4:02 am
Greater Vancouver Sewerage and Drainage District, 2019 BCCA 66 (38601) Does the doctrine of good faith performance apply here. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 10:00 pm
Pursuant to Kentucky Revised Statute (KRS) 100.9865(12), contiguous landowners and landowners within 500 feet of the proposed tower were duly notified of the application. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 3:31 pm
In a decision filed January 29, and belatedly ordered published on February 18, 2015, the Fourth District Court of Appeal rejected numerous CEQA (and other) challenges to the City of San Diego’s regular, after-the-fact coastal and site development permits authorizing already-completed emergency storm drainage repair work as well as site revegetation at a hillside site in La Jolla. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 8:24 am
The Judge rejected an array of defense arguments from the South Florida Water Management District, including that a permit wasn't needed because the state agency wasn't the source of the tainted water, but was simply moving it between two similar places -- the giant lake and the drainage canals crisscrossing the vast farming area to the southeast. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 4:15 am
Lastly, the court found that the use storage magazines was a separate use from the canine training facility because the storage magazines fell within the ordinance’s definition of warehouse, and because warehouses were permitted only in certain districts they were thus prohibited in other districts where not expressively permitted. [read post]
