Search for: "Drake v. Stephens"
Results 21 - 30
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2010, 10:02 am
The second letter is from NWC Executive Director Stephen M. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
Federal Court confirms Mars has exclusive right to use colour ‘Whiskas purple’ for cat food: Mars Australia Pty Ltd (formerly Effem Foods Pty Ltd) v Société des Produits Nestlé SA (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) FCAFC: On appeal, simulated flames from direct light found infringing: Bitech Engineering v Garth Living Pty Ltd (Patentology) (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Prison for infringement of IP rights in Australia! [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 9:22 pm
Harty v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:36 am
Tomasovic, Brian S. and Stephen V. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Arp, Note: New Jersey Carpenters vacation fund v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Arp, Note: New Jersey Carpenters vacation fund v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Hamilton (Drake), Gregg W. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:09 am
Shannon’s article Prescribing a Balance: The Texas Legislative Responses to Sell v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 3:18 pm
Donohoo v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
