Search for: "Dubin v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2022, 12:55 pm by Edward S. Zas
In case you missed it, the Supreme Court recently granted certiorari in Dubin v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 9:38 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Issue summary is from ScotusBlog, which also links to papers: Dubin v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:41 am
Employees cannot avoid competitive examination otherwise requiredBloomberg-Dubin v Board of Education, 82 AD2d 854, affd 56 NY2d 555 In a case involving the question of whether the New York City Board of Education could require certain teachers to be subject to appointment and licensing by competitive examination, the court stated that the Board could not be stopped from requiring that the competitive examination be held. [read post]
Photo by Soumil Kumar on Pexels.comBy: HR Fitzmorris The Supreme Court recently granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in Dubin v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 3:00 am by SHG
United States, 491 U.S. 617 (1989) and United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 10:47 am by Jamelle C. Sharpe
Yaira Dubin, assistant to the solicitor general, argues for the United States. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 3:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In any event, whether plaintiff can ultimately prevail on these allegations is not relevant on this pre-answer motion to dismiss (see Endless Ocean, LLC v Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, 113 AD3d 587, 589 [2d Dept 2014]). [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 11:25 am by Michael H. Cohen
Case summary The Kentucky State Board of Physical Therapy sued to enjoin Dubin Orthopaedic Centre, Inc. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 4:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, accepting the facts alleged in the complaint as true, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, the plaintiff stated a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice (see Tooma v Grossbarth, 121 AD3d at 1095-1096; Endless Ocean, LLC v Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, 113 AD3d 587, 589 [2014]; Reynolds v Picciano, 29 AD2d 1012, 1012 [1968]). [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 4:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The defendant’s evidentiary submissions did not establish that a material fact alleged in the complaint is not a fact at all and that no significant dispute exists regarding it (see Lopez v Lozner & Mastropietro, P.C., 166 AD3d 871, 873; see also Endless Ocean, LLC v Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, 113 AD3d at 589). [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 4:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “Here, accepting the facts alleged in the complaint as true, and according the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, the plaintiff stated a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice (see Tooma v Grossbarth, 121 AD3d at 1095-1096; Endless Ocean, LLC v Twomey, Latham, Shea, Kelley, Dubin & Quartararo, 113 AD3d 587, 589; Reynolds v Picciano, 29 AD2d 1012, 1012). [read post]