Search for: "Duggan v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 55
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2013, 3:44 pm
Duggan, LLC V. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:48 pm
Last week, in the case of United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 7:32 am
Duggan v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 2:23 pm
Duggan had called the State to report them and, in retaliation, told Integrity to terminate Mr. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 11:58 am
In United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 5:18 am
And get the court's entire opinion in Eclipse Manufacturing v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 4:08 am
See United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 3:16 pm
The first case is United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
In its January 30, 2103 decision in Parker v. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 6:50 am
Duggan, as you may recall, wrote an anonymous letter complaining about the former state ethics chief, Alan Plofsky. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 3:51 am
First up is Lucky Brand Dungarees v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:39 am
In People v Nappo (94 NY2d 564 [2000]), we held that the State was not the “owner” of uncollected taxes within the meaning of the statutory definition of the term because “taxes due were not the property of the State prior to their remittance” (id. at 566). [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:57 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 2:15 pm
ConAgra Foods points to the Court’s 1990 decision in Carden v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:02 am
” The third case granted on Friday was United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 1:07 pm
Duggan v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 9:45 am
The justices asked some hard questions and made some interesting points, including: On the issue of a constitutional right to home-school, Justice Lynn asked the mother's attorney: The cases you cite were state v. parent, but in this case the state has been forced to settle a dispute between to parents, is there not a difference? [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
Mazars and Trump v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
As Noonan J in the High Court succinctly summarized Collins in Duggan v Commissioner of an Garda Síochána [2017] IEHC 565 (06 October 2017) [8], a breach of section 7 DPA88 “is not actionable per se but only on proof of actual damage”. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:47 pm
CRAFTWORK, INC. v. [read post]
