Search for: "Duke Power Co. v. City of High Point"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2024, 1:58 pm
DUKE. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
People with access to high-quality information will get ahead. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:19 am
Co. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
In Francis v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
Co. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 7:36 am
Smith ’67 Professor of Law at Duke Law School, where he co-directs the Center for Firearms Law. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 5:49 am
Duke Power Co. (1971)--presumptively forbids employers from using hiring criteria that have a disproportionate effect on racial minorities (or women) regardless of whether the employer was motivated by a desire to discriminate against applicants based on race (or sex). [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
The case, Trump v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:28 pm
In his unusually pointed remarks, Chairman Clayton did not mince words, stating: “Market professionals, especially gatekeepers, need to act responsibly and hold themselves to high standards. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Kokesh v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
The Reyelts Opinion In addition to Texas Insurance Code chapter 4102, the legal landscape forming the basis of the Keys' motion for class certification includes a federal court case, Reyelts v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
The Reyelts Opinion In addition to Texas Insurance Code chapter 4102, the legal landscape forming the basis of the Keys' motion for class certification includes a federal court case, Reyelts v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 9:38 am
Duke Power Co. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm
At one stage this was as high as £2 million. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm
At one stage this was as high as £2 million. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
That last point requires an unconventional course, such as "Elements," to be able to add value measured both by its contribution to a rigorous standard of substantive quality and a high level of relevance for the integrated program of study leading to a flexible but useful J.D. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am
” I think the point is rather obvious, but I’ll give an example. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 1:17 pm
If Congress has addressed a federal issue by statute, then there is no gap for federal common law to fill. . . 'The test for whether congressional legislation excludes the declaration of federal common law is simply whether the statute speak[s] directly to [the] question at issue.' [citing: American Electric Power Co., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
Co. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 5:15 am
(Your Secrets Are Safe Here) - http://bit.ly/rgPGAS (Ralph Losey) When You Know, You Know: Cache La Poudre Feeds LLC v. [read post]
