Search for: "Duke v. Leake"
Results 1 - 20
of 59
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2010, 7:00 am
Steven Greenhouse has an article in the New York Times Thursday about a new development in the Dukes v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 12:34 am
AP offers this report on Duke v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 3:25 pm
This post begins: "The Campaign Legal Center today filed an amici brief with the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Duke v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 4:29 am
SCOTUSBlog previews Duke v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:40 am
Some of these leaks have affected drinking-water resources. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 10:59 am
Supreme Court denied certiorari in the North Carolina judicial public financing case, Duke v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 2:59 am
Supreme Court denied certiorari in the North Carolina judicial public financing case, Duke v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 7:34 am
Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 5:01 pm
You can find the cert. petition here. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 4:13 pm
ZDNet reports that a hacker has leaked the date of 2.28 million users of the dating site Meet Mindful. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 7:23 am
The Wall Street Journal also reports on the leaked decisions. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 4:06 pm
V. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 5:08 am
(quoting Price quoting Dukes). [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 4:29 am
.* How to Improve Patent Quality: Conference HighlightsMike Mireles brings us some of the best bits of the recent Santa Clara-Duke conference on Patent Quality. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm
Absent negligence, the duty to repair only arose once the landlord was aware that damage had been caused.On the specific leaks, he found CHA were liable in respect of the February 2005 leak, as this could and should have been remedied by 8 April 2005, not 26 April, following Duke of Westminster v Guild [1985] 1 QB 688 and Gordon and Teixeira v Selico Co Ltd (1986) 18 HLR 219On the other leaks, he found that CHA had carried out repairs in good… [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm
Absent negligence, the duty to repair only arose once the landlord was aware that damage had been caused.On the specific leaks, he found CHA were liable in respect of the February 2005 leak, as this could and should have been remedied by 8 April 2005, not 26 April, following Duke of Westminster v Guild [1985] 1 QB 688 and Gordon and Teixeira v Selico Co Ltd (1986) 18 HLR 219On the other leaks, he found that CHA had carried out repairs in good… [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 5:05 pm
The last vestige of real privacy known to the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge’s new baby boy was that which he experienced in the womb. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 2:59 pm
Dukes and Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 3:00 am
The White Paper (correctly) invoked the Hamdi v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 5:12 pm
The class action suit is styled Dukes v. [read post]
