Search for: "Duke v. Richards" Results 1 - 20 of 330
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2011, 11:00 am by Walter Olson
Dukes: some early analysis (1) Wal-Mart v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 6:03 pm by CivPro Blogger
According to this press release: Tomorrow, Wednesday, June 20—the one year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in Dukes v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 6:30 am by CivPro Blogger
Here's the abstract: This Essay for the Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc roundtable on Dukes... [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:13 am by James R. Copland
And as Blackman notes, the Dukes decisions, both majority and dissent, are replete with citations to our dear departed friend Richard Nagareda's published writings, both The Preexistence Principle and the Structure of the Class Action, 103 Colum. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Wal-Mart case: Elizabeth Chamblee Burch, "Introduction: Dukes v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:15 am
Dukes: Circuit Judge Richard A. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 6:13 pm by Walter Olson
Tags: class actions, Supreme Court, Wal-Mart Related posts Ted on the SEC and Stoneridge (3) Ted Frank on the Dukes v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:10 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
   The opinion, authored by respected Judge Richard Posner, is McReynolds v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Dukes, ___ U.S. ___ (Jun. 20, 2011) relied heavily on a 2009 law review article by the late Professor Richard A. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 12:22 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Co-authored by Richard Alfred and Kevin Young Since the Supreme Court decided Dukes v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 3:39 am by Ted Frank
Dukes ends class actions—or even employment class actions? [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 11:16 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Co-authored by Richard Alfred and Kevin Young It has been more than a year since the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 5:54 am
Consider several categories. 1) Statements by Duke and its officials, particularly President Richard Brodhead, that implied that the players had done something wrong (including possible sexual assault and use of racist epithets) and that they were not cooperating with the investigation by hiding behind a "blue wall of silence. [read post]