Search for: "Duncan, in Re" Results 61 - 80 of 778
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2023, 7:30 am by Ted Parson
(For a more sympathetic reading of the NUA proposal and supporting paper, see the recent LP post by Emmett Geoengineering Governance Fellow Duncan McLaren.) [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 7:22 am
The Stanford Law School Chapter of the Federalist Society, which invited Judge Duncan to speak, got almost no faculty support (only two reached out privately), even though not just Judge Duncan but also Federalist students were targeted. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 3:18 pm by Chris Williams
If You're Going To Go, Take Your Friends With You: DLA Piper just snagged a great group. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:54 am by David Oscar Markus
" "You're not welcome here, we hate you! [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 2:16 pm by jonathanturley
Steinbach declared “It’s uncomfortable to say that for many people here, you’re work has caused harm. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 5:31 am
If you're going to call other people "emotional" and "frustrated," you'd better be sure you're not emotional and frustrated. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 9:54 am by Josh Blackman
And that opinion was written by–so we're told–one of the biggest hacks in the judiciary: Judge Jim Ho. [read post]
Josh Zygmont interviews Erika Duncan and Aaron Olman, Human Capital Advisors and Co-founders at People on Point. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 11:26 am by INFORRM
IPSO 10769-22 Edwards v gazette-news.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), 12 Discrimination (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 11100-22 Banks v theboltonnews.co.uk, 12 Discrimination (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), No breach – after investigation 11622-22 Duncan v The Sun on Sunday, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication Statements in open court and apologies There were no statements or apologies in… [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 4:25 am by jonathanturley
” Thirteen judges agreed with the conclusion though twelve (Chief Judge Richman and Judges Jones, Smith, Stewart, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, and Wilson) reversed on lenity grounds while eight members (Judges Jones, Smith, Elrod, Willett, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, and Wilson) reversed on the ground that federal law unambiguously fails to cover non-mechanical bump stocks. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:07 pm by Eugene Volokh
A bump stock is a firearm attachment that allows a shooter to harness the natural recoil of a semi-automatic weapon to quickly re-engage the trigger after firing, enabling him to shoot at an increased rate of speed. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 8:03 am
We're told Bythell studied law but decided he didn't want "a conventional life. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 5:01 am by Stephen Halbrook
One of the cases the Supreme Court vacated and remanded after Bruen was Duncan v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Air Force generals, Duncan McNabb and William Fraser III, who oversaw the supply routes later tried to cash in on their Azerbaijan connections. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
" Finally, I read the Declaration of Robert Spitzer, which is Exhibit E of the California Attorney General's Supplemental Brief in Response to the Court's Order of September, 26, 2022, Duncan v. [read post]