Search for: "Duncan v. Black"
Results 61 - 67
of 67
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2009, 5:38 pm
Duncan; 2005 CarswellOnt 4451; 202 O.A.C. 233, 135 C.R.R. (2d) 251.] [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 12:58 pm
Ben Lehman on Duncan Bucknell's IP Think Tank asks, has the fat lady finished singing at YouTube?. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Crevor, 3 Binney 121 (1810); Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: Nine v IceTV: (International Law Office) Benelux Some new rules of the Director-General of the Benelux Organisation for Intellectual Property with regard to trade mark filings refused on absolute grounds and withdrawal of oppositions: (Class 46) Brazil Brazil exports agricultural technology to developing world: (IP tango) Canada Conservatives website faces claims of copyright infringement: (Michael Geist), Canada’s trade mark opposition practice… [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
: (The Invent Blog), Impressive work on history of ‘Happy Birthday’ and copyright protection: (Innovationpartners), Gender and copyright: (Patry Copyright Blog) Events 1 July: US PLI: ‘Prior art & obviousness 2008: The PTO and CAFC perspective on patent law sections 102 & 103’ - New York: (Patent Docs), 1-2 July – C5 conference on intellectual asset management for high-tech industries – Paris: (c5-online.com), 2… [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: ECJ rules trade mark holders cannot stop honest comparative advertising: O2 Holdings Limited and O2 (UK) Limited v Hutchinson 3G UK Limited: (Out-Law), (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
