Search for: "Duncan v. Smith" Results 21 - 40 of 99
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2021, 10:01 am by Josh Blackman
They could seek rehearing en banc, though given the three-judge panel (Smith, Willett, Duncan), further review is unlikely. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 2:30 pm by Josh Blackman
Judge Ho, and four of his colleague, dissented from the denial of rehearing en banc: Judges Jones, Smith, Elrod, and Duncan. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 1:19 pm by Josh Blackman
Sessions (CA5 2018) (Elrod, J., joined by Jones, Smith, Willett, Ho, Duncan, and Engelhardt, JJ., dissenting from denial of reh'g en banc); Tyler v. [read post]
31 May 2020, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
Canada On 25 May 2020, default judgment was given in the defamation case of Duncan v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm by Chris Castle
[This is a version of a letter I sent to the Senate Subcommittee on Intellectual Property today to call attention to various discrepancies in the proposed witness list, especially the presence of the Pirate Party at a hearing at the world’s greatest deliberative body. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 8:56 am by Kate Fort
Duncan asked 19, Dennis and Jones asked 11, Smith asked 7 and Costa asked 5. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 1:10 pm by sydniemery
Gonzalez’s article The New Batson: Opening the Door of the Jury Deliberation Room After Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:30 am by Will Baude
Duncan, 79 F.3d 306, 311–12 (2d Cir. 1996); Vector Research, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2019, 1:05 pm
Cir. 2016); see In re Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, and Smith, Inc., 828 F.2d 1567, 1571 (Fed. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
, (Croatian Political Science Review (December, 2018)).Christopher Sundby & Suzanna Sherry, Term Limits and Turmoil: Roe v. [read post]