Search for: "Duncan v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 364
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2010, 2:09 pm
No. 08-1521 United States Supreme Court Decision: Decided: June 28, 2010 In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment of the US Constitution protects an individual’s Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms from interference by state or local gun control legislation. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 11:38 am by Kyle Duncan
Hodges, fifteen states submitted an amicus brief cautioning that a decision constitutionalizing the issue of same-sex marriage would repudiate the Court’s own recent decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 2:18 pm by Duncan Hollis
  She begins with an historical defense: From the birth of the United States as a nation, foreign and international law influenced legal reasoning and judicial decisionmaking. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 6:03 am by Brian A. Comer
This is another punitive damages case, coming shortly after Duncan v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 7:50 pm by LTA-Editor
Duncan Stark Blog Editor   On Monday, the Supreme Court released its highly anticipated decision in the Fourth Amendment case Unites States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 5:44 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  The assignments of error to be argued in United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 8:53 am by Duncan Hollis
by Duncan Hollis Yesterday, the Japanese Government (now led by the Democratic Party after nearly five-plus decades of rule by the Liberal Democratic Party) confirmed that in the 1960s Japan and the United States entered into a series of secret defense pacts. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 3:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
The court then decided that question in the challengers' favor: "[F]reedom of association is never mentioned in the United States Constitution. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:28 am by Duncan Hollis
    Our focus was solely on the United States. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 6:37 am by Kiran Bhat
The Court also released an opinion yesterday in United States v. [read post]