Search for: "Dunlap v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 137
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2008, 2:08 pm
United States (07-10689) is available here. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 9:41 am
Never, is the answer from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 11:12 am
In addition to the state and federal courts of D.C., VA, and M.D., he is a member of the Federal Courts in Puerto Rico, Colorado, and Texas, as well as the Court of Federal Claims, the Federal Circuit, where he has recently argued and won three appellate matters, the Veteran’s Court of Appeals, and the United States Supreme Court, where he was lead counsel on a False Claims Act case (See United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 10:30 am
Title III was enacted to “deter trafficking in wrongfully confiscated property” and provide “United States nationals who were the victims of these confiscations . . . with a judicial remedy in the courts of the United States. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 8:30 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has initiated a new invitation-only pilot program to address subject matter eligibility rejections under 35 USC 101. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 1:53 pm
Carter v. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 11:35 am
United States, 74 Fed. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 2:00 pm
Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 4:18 am
Last September, I noted the case of Dunlap v. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 1:32 pm
We handle hundreds of new patent applications each year, with offices located nationwide and near the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 11:59 am
United States Surgical Corp., 135 F.3d 1456, 1460 (Fed. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 9:53 am
United States, 906 F.3d 982 (Fed. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 11:58 am
March 11, 2024 | By: Thomas Dunlap On February 12, 2024, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) released guidance and a solicitation for public comments on assessing inventorship in the context of inventions aided by artificial intelligence (AI). [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 1:35 pm
Supreme Court in an 8-1 decision issued on June 30, 2020, in United States Patent and Trademark Office et al. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 1:59 pm
Website owners and web scrapers will want to watch hi’Q Labs’ litigation against LinkedIn Corp. to see if these two characteristics are, in fact, compatible, something placed in doubt by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in HiQ Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 9:56 am
[1] Hernandez v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 10:16 am
Villanueva National Collegiate Athletic Association v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 11:37 am
January 5, 2023 | By: Ryan Kennedy On November 7, 2022, the United States District Court for the District of Virginia decided the case of Harrell v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 10:58 am
United States, 525 F.3d 1139 (Fed. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 10:58 pm
Under the revision, even if a federal judge thinks the state court conviction was unconstitutional, the defendant can still lose if the state appeals courts did not unreasonably apply settled constitutional standards.The case is Dunlap v. [read post]
