Search for: "Dunn v. Clarke"
Results 1 - 20
of 53
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Rachel Dunn, Paul Maharg and Victoria Roper, eds., What is Legal Education For? [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 4:44 pm
In Murray v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:37 pm
And the privacy interests protected by that constitutional tort have been balanced against the public interest in freedom of expression at irish law in exactly the same way that they were balanced at all three levels in Bloomberg (here, the leading case is Cogley v RTÉ [2005] 4 IR 79, [2005] IEHC 180 (8 June 2005) (Clarke J); see also Herrity v Associated Newspapers [2009] 1 IR 316, [2008] IEHC 249 (18 July 2008)… [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Some called for Congress to restore the FTC’s authority to seek monetary remedies for deceptive practices under 13(b), which the Supreme Court’s decision in AMG Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 2:51 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm
And, in Dunnes Stores v Ryan [2002] IEHC 61 (5 June 2002), Kearns J in the High Court struck down section 19(6) of the Companies Act, 1990 (also here), which required a company to provide an explanation or make a statement to an officer making inquiries about the company, on the grounds, inter alia, that it infringed the right to silence implied into Article 40.6.1(i) (a right now being relocated to Article 38.1 of the Constitution insofar as it… [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 4:10 pm
The Times and Mail Online have apologised to the chairman of BAFTA after falsely claiming he had “close links” with actor Noel Clarke. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Roger V. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Roger V. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36] (O’Donnell J)… [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm
Instead, in Murphy v Callinan [2018] IESC 59 (30 November 2018) Baker J (Clarke CJ and Dunne J concurring) approved and applied Collins. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
And, in Murphy v Callinan [2018] IESC 59 (30 November 2018) [36]-[44], Baker J (Clarke CJ and Dunne J concurring) in the Supreme Court approved Feeney J’s analysis in Collins (I will return to this case in a future post). [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
The Four Courts, Dublin Author Jtdirl Released into public domain by the copyright owner Source Wikipedia Supreme Court of Ireland Jane Lambert Irish Supreme Court (Chief Justice Clarke and Justices O'Donnel Donal, McKechnie, Dunne, O'Malley and Iseult) Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Clonmel Healthcare Ltd. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
Fang G, Araujo V, Guerrant RL. (1991). [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
The case, Trump v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm
If we were to view it this way, the law would survive, according to cases like Ward v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
And in Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) O’Donnell J (Denham CJ, Clarke, MacMenamin and Dunne JJ concurring) went further (at [36]): I have reservations about the language of balancing of rights and the hierarchy of rights referred to in the Irish Times case [Irish Times Ltd v Ireland [1998] 1 IR 359, [1997] 2 ILRM 541, [1997] IEHC 30 (18 February 1997)] and relied on in the judgment of… [read post]
17 May 2017, 4:10 am
Dunn, Sandoz Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
The first is Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:53 am
Yesterday, the court heard oral argument in Hernández v. [read post]
