Search for: "Dunn v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 513
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2017, 3:39 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 11:50 am by David Debold
United States threatened to have a dangerous chilling effect on the everyday functioning of our democratic system. [read post]
10 May 2007, 1:08 am
See also Markell, Amicus Curiae Brief in Favor of Respondent, Bank of America v. 203 North LaSalle Street Partnership, No. 97-1498, United States Supreme Court, October Term 1997 (filed August 17, 1998).But I'm still in search of another source: I could swear that somewhere in the work of Mr. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 8:02 am by Ken White
He has that "right" under a United States Supreme Court case called Brady v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 6:22 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Last night, the White House announced that President Trump will nominate acting Solicitor General Noel Francisco to be the next solicitor general of the United States. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 2:43 pm
Philip Morris: Topping the list is United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
The decisionThe IPO’s decision focused on the words of section 3(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, which states that “trade marks which are devoid of any distinctive character” -- an absolute bar to registration that comes from Article 3(1)(b) of the Trade Mark Directive and is paralleled in Article 7(1)(b) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation.The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Case C-37/03 BioID v OHIM stated that the various… [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:44 pm
The effects have been profound, especially with respect to the role of states, and especially of the United States as its long time position in global affairs undergoes significant change. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:31 am
  It is well settled that "[a] subrogee acquires all rights, defenses and remedies of the subrogor and is subject to any claims or defenses which may be raised against the subrogor" (Servidori v Mahoney, 129 AD2d 944, 945 [1987]; see United States Fid. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
The decision is about likelihood of confusion, reputed trade marks' extended protection, and passing off.* The Naked Truth: use of BARELY THERE wasn't even barely thereAnother Irish Patents Office’s decision that Jeremy reports is HBI Branded Apparel Enterprises LLC v Dunnes Stores Ireland Company. [read post]