Search for: "Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Broudo" Results 41 - 59 of 59
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2008, 3:34 am
 This decision comes just two weeks after another panel of the same court cautioned, based on similar facts, that “[e]nabling a plaintiff to proceed on such a theory would effectively resurrect what Dura [Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 3:34 am
 This decision comes just two weeks after another panel of the same court cautioned, based on similar facts, that “[e]nabling a plaintiff to proceed on such a theory would effectively resurrect what Dura [Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:53 am by Kevin LaCroix
Prior to his judicial service, Judge Gorsuch also wrote an amicus brief for the United States Chamber of Commerce in Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:53 am by Kevin LaCroix
Prior to his judicial service, Judge Gorsuch also wrote an amicus brief for the United States Chamber of Commerce in Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 7:55 am by Barry Barnett
Fifth Circuit decision Citing the Supreme Court's ruling on loss causation in Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 5:01 am
Charter Communications; and (2) some clarification on loss causation as articulated by the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
To limit damages to the inflation dissipated by corrective disclosures, as required by Dura Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 2:07 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Nessim MezrahiIn the following guest post, Nessim Mezrahi takes a detailed look at the factors driving D&O profitability and the securities class action loss mitigation steps insurers can take to improve profitability. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 6:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Vivendi argued that the price maintenance theory adopted by the district court contravenes the Supreme Court’s requirement that there must be a direct causal connection between the misrepresentation and the loss, citing Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm by Beck, et al.
  Id. at 526 (it is “not. . .proper to assume that the [plaintiff] can prove facts that it has not alleged or that the defendants [can be liable] in ways that have not been alleged”).More recently, in Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. [read post]