Search for: "Dyson George"
Results 1 - 20
of 60
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am
On 27 February 2024, judgment on meaning was handed down by Lewis J in the long-running litigation between the Dyson Group companies and the broadcasters Channel 4 and ITN, Dyson Technology Ltd & Anor v Channel Four Television Corporation & Anor [2024] EWHC 400 (KB). [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am
On Tuesday 20 and Wednesday 21 February 2024, the High Court heard an appeal against the 2023 decision to deny Julian Assange permission to appeal his extradition order. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am
The Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) has reversed its decision not to allow a claim against Meta alleging abuse of its market dominance to progress. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am
George v [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
On 1 February 2024, Steyn J dismissed the application to amend the Claim Form and struck out the existing claim in Trump v Orbis Business Intelligence Ltd [2024] EWHC 173 (KB). [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 1:35 am
The UK Government has taken steps to investigate The Telegraph Media Group’s proposed purchase by Redbird IMI, an Abu Dhabi-backed group. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am
Reserved Judgments Dyson v Channel 4, heard 15 December 2023 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Amersi v BBC, heard 8 December 2023 (HHJ Lewis) Shafi v New Vision TV Limited and another, heard 4 December 2023 (Johnson J) Wilson v Mendelsohn [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm
The High Court in Belfast has struck out the libel claim brought by former IRA member, Gerry Kelly, against writer Malachi O’Doherty in relation to two 2019 interviews in which he alleged that the claimant had shot a police officer in the head during the 1983 Maze prison escape. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am
Happy New Year to all Inforrm readers! [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am
On the same day, there was a trial of a preliminary issue on meaning and comment in the libel case of Dyson v Channel 4 before HHJ Lewis. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am
On Tuesday 5 December 2023 there was a hearing before Fancourt J in the case of Various Claimants v NGN dealing with consequentials following the settlement of all the claims listed for hearing in January 2024. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
On 1 December 2023, Mr Justice Jay handed down judgement in favour of the defendant in the case of Dyson v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB). [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
Last Week in the Courts On Tuesday 21 November 2023 the libel trial in the case of Dyson v MGN Ltd begun before Jay J. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
The ICO is seeking permission to appeal the ruling on Clearview AI Inc handed down by the First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights) on 17 October 2023. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm
On Monday 9 October 2023 Johnson J heard a pre-trial review in the case of Dyson v MGN Limited. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 8:14 am
Real property law — Foreclosure — Standing In 2019, Clarke, Dyson, Menapace, appellee, acting as Substitute Trustee, filed an Order to Docket, in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, seeking to foreclose on real property owned by Alan M. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 7:15 am
Fidell and Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck) FISA Reauthorization A Close and Critical Look at the ‘Five Things’ the ACLU Says You Need to Know About ‘NSA Mass Surveillance’ by George Croner (@GeorgeCroner) and James Petrila The Year of Section 702 Reform, Part III: Why Congress Should Not Exempt Warrantless “Foreign Intelligence” Queries by Elizabeth Goitein (@LizaGoitein) Artificial Intelligence The Perils and Promise of AI Regulation by Faiza Patel… [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
Former MP George Osborne has called in police after a “malicious” email was sent out to wedding guests days before his marriage to Thea Rogers. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
On 26 July 2022, there were hearings in Dyson v MGN Limited before Nicklin J and Smith -v- Baker and another before Griffiths J. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am
On 20 July 2022, the Government published its Response to the Call for Evidence on Strategic Lawsuits against Public Participation [pdf]. [read post]
