Search for: "Dyson v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 103
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2012, 2:11 am
On Wednesday 7 March 2012 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W (Algeria) and BB (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z (Algeria), G (Algeria),U (Algeria) and Y (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 1:33 am
Savage; Powell v United Kingdom [2000] 30 EHRR CD 362). [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:30 pm
Ever since the notion of an operational duty was first enunciated in Osman v United Kingdom (2000) 29 EHRR 245, it has become something of a judicial mantra that the threshold for establishing a “real and immediate” threat was high (see for example Re Officer L [2007] UKHL 36, and Savage v South Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2009] AC 681 [41] and [66],). [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm
No. 40145/98)]; residents of a slum that was engulfed by a methane explosion from a neighbouring tip [Oneryildiz v Turkey (2004) 41 EHRR 20l]; and a local authority moving an elderly resident between care homes [Watts v United Kingdom (2010) 51 EHRR 66]. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 4:05 am
Othman v Secretary of State for the Home Department , 6 February 2012 – read judgment Angus McCullough QC appeared for Abu Qatada as his Special Advocate in this bail hearing. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:58 am
On 30 January, the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson) will hear the case of PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (formerly VV (Jordan) and PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department). [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am
On Tuesday 7 November, the Supreme Court (Lady Hale and Lords Walker, Brown, Mance, and Dyson) heard the appeal of the parents of a young woman, Melanie Rabone, who committed suicide while on home release from a psychiatric unit at Stepping Hill Hospital. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am
Facts The respondent, Gary Flood, was a Detective Sergeant with the Metropolitan Police Service’s Extradition Unit. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
Facts The respondent, Gary Flood, was a Detective Sergeant with the Metropolitan Police Service’s Extradition Unit. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
Facts The respondent, Gary Flood, was a Detective Sergeant with the Metropolitan Police Service’s Extradition Unit. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 6:59 am
On Wednesday, the UK Supreme Court handed down its decision in Al-Rawi v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 10:00 pm
And the Strasbourg Court has stated unambiguously that it regards the strictest institution permitted by UK law, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC), to be a ”fully independent court” which is best placed to ensure that no material was unnecessarily withheld from the detainee (A v United Kingdom 49 EHRR 695). [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:02 am
Lord Hope also indicated that he would have considered the potential for an appeal to the Upper Tribunal curative of any breach of Article 6, following Albert and Le Compte v Belgium (1983) 5 EHRR 533, para 29; Tehrani v United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting [2001] IRLR 208; R (Thompson) v Law Society [2004] 1 WLR 2522 There is one curiosity in the reasoning of Lord Dyson in that he seeks to dismiss concerns that the… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:55 am
Defendants in Iraq oil for food case failed with appeal that criminal offences created by Government pursuant to s.1 United Nations Act 1946 were ultra vires because they were not created “promptly” Patmalneice v SOS Work & Pensions [2011] [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 10:56 pm
Lumba A similar question had been addressed by the court in R (Lumba) v Secrteary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 12 – another case involving the detention of a foreign national prisoner. [read post]
30 May 2011, 11:37 pm
The decision in McCaughey will not impose a Human Rights Act obligation on the state to investigate pre-commencement deaths, as had been argued in McKerr. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am
They stem from the long-established principle of United Kingdom public law that statutory powers must be used for the purpose for which they were conferred and not for some other purpose: Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food [1968] AC 997. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 5:10 am
lessons from the United States and Canada G. [read post]
